User talk:109.151.95.119: Difference between revisions
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:Do not delete every single piece of an editors work just because they'd made a mistake, a worked on the existing content too - correcting it to ensure that it was more understandable. You coming along and bulldozing everything is, in my opinion, vandalism too. [[Special:Contributions/109.151.95.119|109.151.95.119]]<sup>[[User talk:109.151.95.119#top|talk to me]]</sup> 10:38, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | :Do not delete every single piece of an editors work just because they'd made a mistake, a worked on the existing content too - correcting it to ensure that it was more understandable. You coming along and bulldozing everything is, in my opinion, vandalism too. [[Special:Contributions/109.151.95.119|109.151.95.119]]<sup>[[User talk:109.151.95.119#top|talk to me]]</sup> 10:38, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:: Yea, but it's not really though. All I did was undo your edit which not only added speculation, but also ''deleted'' a rename template. I would ask that if you truly believe in the future that half of an edit was fine for policy that you didn't ''continuously'' re-add the half which was directly challenged. It ''is'' vandalism to agree with me that some of what you added was speculation before ''adding it all again'' just to prove a point. For each time you reverted the edits of other users removing the speculatory content and re-adding the tag, you could have simply ''not re-added the content which was challenged'' while adding all of the other stuff. Instead, you left it up to others to clean-up your work over-and-over again for little reason. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 10:49, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | :: Yea, but it's not really though. All I did was undo your edit which not only added speculation, but also ''deleted'' a rename template. I would ask that if you truly believe in the future that half of an edit was fine for policy that you didn't ''continuously'' re-add the half which was directly challenged. It ''is'' vandalism to agree with me that some of what you added was speculation before ''adding it all again'' just to prove a point. For each time you reverted the edits of other users removing the speculatory content and re-adding the tag, you could have simply ''not re-added the content which was challenged'' while adding all of the other stuff. Instead, you left it up to others to clean-up your work over-and-over again for little reason. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 10:49, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::I don't agree with you. You claim that the Monks and the Veritas have nothing in common... despite the fact that they look like each other, wear the same red robes, etc, but I'm not going to go into a big rant about it as I know you wouldn't care and would continue to erase my work. I just wanted my hard work that I knew wouldn't be disputed to be saved. The deletion of the re-name tag was completely accidental when I created the infobox. [[Special:Contributions/109.151.95.119|109.151.95.119]]<sup>[[User talk:109.151.95.119#top|talk to me]]</sup> 10:53, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:53, 21 May 2017
109.151.95.119Thanks for your edits! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is a great time to have joined us, because now you can play the Game of Rassilon with us and win cool stuff! Well, okay, badges. That have no monetary value. And that largely only you can see. But still: they're cool!
Thing is, though, to play the game, you do need to be logged in.
Don't get us wrong: you don't need to have a registered account to make a lot of great edits around here. But you may find that there are good reasons to create an account. For a start, we could call you by a name instead of 109.151.95.119.
Even if you decide not to register, you should be aware that we've got a couple of important quirks for a Wikia wiki.
British English, please
We generally use British English round these parts, so if you're American, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:
- the listing of all our help, policy and guideline pages
- our Manual of Style
- our image use policy
- our user page policy
- a list of users whose job it is to help you
If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! — you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:
Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my talk page. 23skidoo ☎ 10:28, May 21, 2017 (UTC)
Edit war
Please do not revert my edits to Veritas any further. There is no connection between this species and the Monks seen in the latest episode of Doctor Who. Please do not start an edit war over this, as per Tardis:Vandalism policy this is too against our policies. Thank you. OS25 (Talk) 10:35, May 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Do not delete every single piece of an editors work just because they'd made a mistake, a worked on the existing content too - correcting it to ensure that it was more understandable. You coming along and bulldozing everything is, in my opinion, vandalism too. 109.151.95.119talk to me 10:38, May 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Yea, but it's not really though. All I did was undo your edit which not only added speculation, but also deleted a rename template. I would ask that if you truly believe in the future that half of an edit was fine for policy that you didn't continuously re-add the half which was directly challenged. It is vandalism to agree with me that some of what you added was speculation before adding it all again just to prove a point. For each time you reverted the edits of other users removing the speculatory content and re-adding the tag, you could have simply not re-added the content which was challenged while adding all of the other stuff. Instead, you left it up to others to clean-up your work over-and-over again for little reason. OS25 (Talk) 10:49, May 21, 2017 (UTC)
- I don't agree with you. You claim that the Monks and the Veritas have nothing in common... despite the fact that they look like each other, wear the same red robes, etc, but I'm not going to go into a big rant about it as I know you wouldn't care and would continue to erase my work. I just wanted my hard work that I knew wouldn't be disputed to be saved. The deletion of the re-name tag was completely accidental when I created the infobox. 109.151.95.119talk to me 10:53, May 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Yea, but it's not really though. All I did was undo your edit which not only added speculation, but also deleted a rename template. I would ask that if you truly believe in the future that half of an edit was fine for policy that you didn't continuously re-add the half which was directly challenged. It is vandalism to agree with me that some of what you added was speculation before adding it all again just to prove a point. For each time you reverted the edits of other users removing the speculatory content and re-adding the tag, you could have simply not re-added the content which was challenged while adding all of the other stuff. Instead, you left it up to others to clean-up your work over-and-over again for little reason. OS25 (Talk) 10:49, May 21, 2017 (UTC)
