Talk:P.S. (webcast): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→Name) Tag: sourceedit |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
: Our current policy is that this species was neither ''finished'' or ''released''. Thus the article should be about the original product. Also the situation you brought up makes no sense, as ''Shada'' is indeed dabbed by its original intended format -- TV story. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 12:02, May 30, 2017 (UTC) | : Our current policy is that this species was neither ''finished'' or ''released''. Thus the article should be about the original product. Also the situation you brought up makes no sense, as ''Shada'' is indeed dabbed by its original intended format -- TV story. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 12:02, May 30, 2017 (UTC) | ||
::ok I don't know why I got it in to my head that sharda had a hovid dab a better comparison whoud be the lost storys from big finish we all are caneld tv storys that where released on audio like how PS homevid was cancelled but PS webcast was finished and released infact this is listed on the list of unproduced stories as a adeption of the DVD version 13:33, June 1, 2017 (UTC) | |||
::: But we, by our own policies, do not agree that P.S. the webcase managed to be a different piece of media than P.S. the Homevideo. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 13:57, June 1, 2017 (UTC) | |||
[[ | |||
Revision as of 13:57, 1 June 2017
 |
Archives: #1 |
|---|
Canon
why is this not canon the statement at the top of the page that the fact the story was not produced semes wrong as it was made and released as story boreds with arther darvill– The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.26.206.85 (talk).
- Check the archived discussion linked on this page or Forum:P.S.. Also, it is not up to individual users to decide what counts and what doesn't, so when an admin undoes your edit, don't change it back. We have a reason for not including it. Shambala108 ☎ 19:49, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
- having read the thread I'm still no clear on why this is not valid the argument that it was planned as live action but chenged to animation and is there for not valid is strange as nothing that gets published or brocast is as it was originally planned and the story still was made just in a different format if that means it's not valid then that means no version of shada is valid and non of the big finish lost story's can be valid ever also on the bit about shada the Tom baker links make sense in univers given that the curator exist
Invalid?
The invalid tag for this page is not present. Is this a mistake? --Borisashton ☎ 15:26, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
Name
There is a box at the top of the page suggestions a change from webcast to DVD extra which if implemented whoud be a mistake as this my have started as a DVD extra but it was released as a webcast like how shada started as a tV story but was finished as a homvid 178.100.229.176talk to me 08:59, May 30, 2017 (UTC)
- Our current policy is that this species was neither finished or released. Thus the article should be about the original product. Also the situation you brought up makes no sense, as Shada is indeed dabbed by its original intended format -- TV story. OS25 (Talk) 12:02, May 30, 2017 (UTC)
- ok I don't know why I got it in to my head that sharda had a hovid dab a better comparison whoud be the lost storys from big finish we all are caneld tv storys that where released on audio like how PS homevid was cancelled but PS webcast was finished and released infact this is listed on the list of unproduced stories as a adeption of the DVD version 13:33, June 1, 2017 (UTC)
