Talk:Dimensions in Time (TV story): Difference between revisions

Talk:Dimensions in Time (TV story) (edit)

Revision as of 00:13, 6 June 2017

1,081 bytes added , 6 June 2017

→‎If this isn't canon then...: Nothing is canon, so...

Amorkuz

25,433

edits

Revision as of 20:10, 5 June 2017 (edit) TheFatPanda (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Tag: sourceedit ← Older edit		Revision as of 00:13, 6 June 2017 (edit) (undo) Amorkuz (talk \| contribs) (→‎If this isn't canon then...: Nothing is canon, so...) Tag: sourceedit Newer edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Was just reading up on that archived discussion, and I have to ask: why is [[Assimilation² (comic story)\|Assimilation²]] still regarded as canon when [[Star Trek (franchise)\|Star Trek]] has also been established as fictional like EastEnders? [[User:TheFatPanda\|TheFatPanda]] [[User talk:TheFatPanda\|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:10, June 5, 2017 (UTC)		Was just reading up on that archived discussion, and I have to ask: why is [[Assimilation² (comic story)\|Assimilation²]] still regarded as canon when [[Star Trek (franchise)\|Star Trek]] has also been established as fictional like EastEnders? [[User:TheFatPanda\|TheFatPanda]] [[User talk:TheFatPanda\|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:10, June 5, 2017 (UTC)

			: The above statement is inaccurate. As the official [[T:CANON\|canon policy]] states, this wiki has no canon. In particular, ''[[Assimilation² (comic story)\|Assimilation²]]'' is not canon. Note also that some of the old discussions still operate in the times when canon existed. So reading them now may be a bit confusing in relation to the current rules. Stories are considered valid when they pass the [[T:VS\|four validity rules]]. Please also be aware of [[T:BOUND]]: a validity discussion should not be reopened unless you have some piece of information that has not been discussed in the original discussion. Finally, regarding fictional characters, there is a place for them in DWU: it's called the [[Land of Fiction]]. So being fictional does not automatically disqualify a character/story. What matters is whether it is properly integrated with the DWU as a whole. If there is an explanation of how they are related, the story can (but don't have to) be valid. [[User:Amorkuz\|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz\|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:13, June 6, 2017 (UTC)