Talk:Rose Tyler

Hath Monster Files?

Someone added this to the list of Rose Returns appearances. I've watched the Doctor's Daughter multiple times and there's no sign of Rose in the episode. If "Hath Monster Files" refers to a non-televised appearance (perhaps in a comic strip?), then this needs to be indicated. 23skidoo 02:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Rose, miss her, she is an awesome companion

Can't wait for her return, she rocks!

Rose/Bad Wolf/How The Heck did she Survive it!

the Master refers to the Doctor having had a companion who could absorb the Time Vortex, however in context it obvious means others couldn't. So lets see, my questions are thus: 1 - Could she survive taking it in again, you know, had she stuck around to do so - B, no wait 2 - It killed the 9th Doctor just holding it in him for all of 30 seconds, and he's putting it back at the end of that 30-odd seconds, but Rose has it for 5 minutes. In the context of what the Master said, that's saying something special about Rose. One last thing, about her teleporting between realities below in another section.

The Doctor held the time vortex for longer than 30 seconds. You have to remember she feel asleep/went unconscious for a while, that could have been a few minutes or a few hours. ThePolarity 19:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Travelling between Universes

In Stolen Earth, just 4 minutes in where she apepars and looks up and says, "Right, Now we're in trouble." the effect is different from how they travelled before in Army of Ghosts and Doomsday - Also, in the same season, She disappears like a ghost some times, and others disappears in a flash of light. In Turn left for instance, just after alt-Donna's first meeting with her, She fades out with none of the flashy stuff. infact the first time theres the flashy stuff is when alt-donna meets her for the 2nd time, both appear and disappear. Its when she firs tells donna that she also just fades out - Whats with that? - AlexMcpherson who really should register.

Not sure if that's a discrepancy...

Regarding: "The 27th April birthdate is also inconsistent with a statement on the BBC's website: during the lead-up to the episode "Bad Wolf," the website was altered to tie in with the story's Big Brother theme, and a "contestant portrait" for Rose stated that she was an Aries, which is March 21 to April 19. (This of course is fairly irrelevant, as it simply means that whoever did the "contestant portrait" made a mistake regarding either her birthday or when the astrological sign of Aries is commonly accepted to be.) "

Has anyone actually checked whether or not the sun is in the sign of Aries 27th of April in the year 200100? There is, after all, procession of the equinoxes to take into account, and as I understand it the date on which a sun sign ends progresses further into the year each year, albeit very slowly. If, by the year 200081, they have adjusted the dates, then it's very possible, even likely, that the year of birth that would be assumed for a 19-year-old girl in 200100, given her birthday on April 27th, would very certainly be in the sign of Aries. Additionally, since Rose would have never volunteered this information, it could have been extrapolated from a cellular sample. In that case, it could be inaccurate for all sorts of reasons, not limited to background temporal radiation or the fact that you quite simply cannot use any form of cellular chronological dating technique on something that has travelled through time. 173.12.172.149 00:38, September 24, 2009 (UTC)