Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
No edit summary |
(→When the licensor is the BBC: update about novelisations) |
||
Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
|In-universe websites ||[[Thread:121084]]||No||All websites written from an in-universe perspective, such as the [[Torchwood website]], [[Who is Doctor Who?]], and the [[UNIT website]] are disallowed. | |In-universe websites ||[[Thread:121084]]||No||All websites written from an in-universe perspective, such as the [[Torchwood website]], [[Who is Doctor Who?]], and the [[UNIT website]] are disallowed. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Novelisations ||[[Forum:Doctor Who Novelisations - canon or not?]] | |Novelisations ||[[Thread:231243]] || Yes || Conclusion of [[Thread:231343]] overruled [[[[Forum:Doctor Who Novelisations - canon or not?|a previous decision]] in April 2018. Novelisations considered primary — but note that the whole of the proposal at Thread:231243 was '''not accepted'''. In particular, points about naming characters at [[Talk:Miranda (Doctor Who)]] still stands. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[WeLoveTITANS]] comics||[[Thread:177099]]||No||The #WeLoveTitans comic strips in the back of [[Titan Comics|Titan]] comic books are not valid sources, but the humorous backup strips are. | |[[WeLoveTITANS]] comics||[[Thread:177099]]||No||The #WeLoveTitans comic strips in the back of [[Titan Comics|Titan]] comic books are not valid sources, but the humorous backup strips are. |
edits