Tardis:Comics and spoilers: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{moss|Because comics are published over the course of months, there are special rules that apply to them.}}{{lock}} | {{moss|Because comics are published over the course of months, there are special rules that apply to them.}}{{lock}} | ||
{{sc|T:COMIC SPOIL}} | {{sc|T:COMIC SPOIL}} | ||
As compared with stories in other media, comic stories take ages to be fully published. | As compared with stories in other media, comic stories take ages to be fully published. Editors '''''may'' start''' a page about that story from the [[T:OFF REL|official release]] of the very first instalment — ''before'' the story has been completely finished. | ||
== | == Don't go further than today == | ||
When writing a comic story page, don't go beyond what has transpired in the story '''''as currently published''''' at the time you're editing it. | When writing a comic story page, don't go beyond what has transpired in the story '''''as currently published''''' at the time you're editing it. | ||
== Writing about things within the story == | == Writing about things within the story == | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
But you're '''not prohibited''' from writing about things that have already appeared in a published instalment. | But you're '''not prohibited''' from writing about things that have already appeared in a published instalment. | ||
If you choose to start an article about a narrative element ''before the story is fully published'', it's a good idea to write about your subject without assuming that the story is telling you the full truth. Phrases like the following | If you choose to start an article about a narrative element ''before the story is fully published'', it's a good idea to write about your subject without assuming that the story is telling you the full truth. Phrases like the following help to protect against surprises when the next instalment is published: | ||
* ''according to Character X ... | * ''according to Character X ... | ||
* ''in the opinion of Character B ... | * ''in the opinion of Character B ... | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Dealing with cliffhangers == | == Dealing with cliffhangers == | ||
Multi-issue comic stories are a [[serial]] | Multi-issue comic stories are a [[serial]] art form. [[Cliffhanger]]s are employed to keep the reader interested from one instalment to the next. Most cliffhangers work by ''misdirecting'' the reader. | ||
That's why taking early parts of a comic story at face value is often a very unwise idea, as comic writers delight in telling lies that will sell issues. You must be ''very'' careful. Think about most of the good televised cliffhangers. If this wiki had been going when ''[[The Caves of Androzani (TV story)|The Caves of Androzani]]'' premiered, we could potentially have written that the Fifth Doctor and Peri got shot by a firing squad — something that never actually happened. This sort of ''total'' misdirection happens at the conclusion of almost every instalment of modern comic stories. | |||
For this reason, it's probably best if you do not ascribe ''any'' certainty to ''anything'' contained in a comic ''cliffhanger'' until the story is completely published. | For this reason, it's probably best if you do not ascribe ''any'' certainty to ''anything'' contained in a comic ''cliffhanger'' until the story is completely published. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:44, 21 July 2018
|
Official releases → Where spoilers are allowed → Ways you can avoid spoilers → What is not a spoiler → Comics and spoilers |
As compared with stories in other media, comic stories take ages to be fully published. Editors may start a page about that story from the official release of the very first instalment — before the story has been completely finished.
Don't go further than today
When writing a comic story page, don't go beyond what has transpired in the story as currently published at the time you're editing it.
Writing about things within the story
It is often a safer course of action to wait until the story has been completely published before starting articles about the narrative elements, like characters, places or gizmos.
But you're not prohibited from writing about things that have already appeared in a published instalment.
If you choose to start an article about a narrative element before the story is fully published, it's a good idea to write about your subject without assuming that the story is telling you the full truth. Phrases like the following help to protect against surprises when the next instalment is published:
- according to Character X ...
- in the opinion of Character B ...
- at the time that such and such happened, Character C said ...
Dealing with cliffhangers
Multi-issue comic stories are a serial art form. Cliffhangers are employed to keep the reader interested from one instalment to the next. Most cliffhangers work by misdirecting the reader.
That's why taking early parts of a comic story at face value is often a very unwise idea, as comic writers delight in telling lies that will sell issues. You must be very careful. Think about most of the good televised cliffhangers. If this wiki had been going when The Caves of Androzani premiered, we could potentially have written that the Fifth Doctor and Peri got shot by a firing squad — something that never actually happened. This sort of total misdirection happens at the conclusion of almost every instalment of modern comic stories.
For this reason, it's probably best if you do not ascribe any certainty to anything contained in a comic cliffhanger until the story is completely published.
