Trusted
44,432
edits
More actions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
Borisashton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I'd like to argue that ''Infinity'' is canon. All the reasons for ''Legacy'' not being canon are due to the infinite possibilities of character combinations going into different settings and not being able to narrow down the events. As well as fitting in with the 4 criteria of being canon, each story has a finite happening, not acknowledging the player "moving gems about". I don't see why this can't be in the DWU. [[User:StevieGLiverpool|StevieGLiverpool]] [[User talk:StevieGLiverpool|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:28, August 10, 2018 (UTC) | :I'd like to argue that ''Infinity'' is canon. All the reasons for ''Legacy'' not being canon are due to the infinite possibilities of character combinations going into different settings and not being able to narrow down the events. As well as fitting in with the 4 criteria of being canon, each story has a finite happening, not acknowledging the player "moving gems about". I don't see why this can't be in the DWU. [[User:StevieGLiverpool|StevieGLiverpool]] [[User talk:StevieGLiverpool|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:28, August 10, 2018 (UTC) | ||
::Anything anyone needs to add? [[User:StevieGLiverpool|StevieGLiverpool]] [[User talk:StevieGLiverpool|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:08, August 22, 2018 (UTC) | ::Anything anyone needs to add? [[User:StevieGLiverpool|StevieGLiverpool]] [[User talk:StevieGLiverpool|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:08, August 22, 2018 (UTC) | ||
:::Well in regards to validity, this conversation should not be happening here. It should be happening on the forums. [[User:NateBumber]] only left the message there as a notice. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:13, August 22, 2018 (UTC) | |||