Talk:Master Race

Why should this be deleted? It was a valid entity for a bit. At best it's a merge. And why list it for deletion when you can't be bothered to leave a comment as to why...?--Golden Monkey 16:01, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

I retract the proposed deletion, the article stands well enough on its own. It does need something of a cleanup as the history reads as a basic description of events.

And probably information added/merged into the The Master (Harold Saxon) article where there is a Master Race sub-section. --Tangerineduel 15:37, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

I've given the article a once-over. I agree I think it's a valid topic. 23skidoo 15:02, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

reproduction

. "Also unclear is whether the change applied to infants and newborns, or whether, had the Master Race been allowed to continue, any possibility of procreation existed"

well donna was un changed ^^

List of individuals

Although we have decided to remove from individual character pages that they were turned into part of the master race, shouldn't we create an article for them. And we would need two sections, those we know were turned, and those we believe to have turned, but have no confirmation of. The Thirteenth Doctor 20:18, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

I disagree. We know all humans were turn, as it is stated in the episode that all humans were turned. I however think we should create a section for those who we know or think, will not have turned. Mini-mitch 21:31, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

I agree a section should be made. Those not turned are Donna and Luke from what I know. Probably Jack too. User:Solar Dragon/Signature 20:36, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

I know it sounds weird, but with time-travel and space travel a main part of the show, saying that the entire human race was definitely turned into the Master would be incorrect (like Rose for example, part of the human race, but not turned). If not a section for that then at least a note at the bottom saying that due to the nature of the show, we cannot confirm that all humans were present at the time of change. That's the kind of thing I mean. And I also agree for the ones we thing will not have changed. --The Thirteenth Doctor 20:39, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Rose was not on Earth when the Master turned the human race into the Master Race, she was on a parallel Earth, Donna was not affect as she was half Time Lord. So I'm not sure if time traveller were not un-affected, is think they probably were. Mini-mitch 21:44, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Nazis

Is the referrence to Hitler's Master Race not relevant?

----67.180.86.254 18:31, February 23, 2011 (UTC)\

I think it's relevant. Maybe it's because I just have Jewish heritage, but you know... It was a big event and all... Special:Contributions/BBthebear November 17, 2015 (UTC)\

The Master Race - Individual Memories

When the people of Earth were turned into Master-Duplicates, did those duplicates retain some or all of the memories of the humans that they used to be ? For example, the Master-Duplicates that were soldiers have the memories & training of the human soldiers, or did they only all get the memories of the original Master ? 80.254.146.140^{talk to me} 14:58, January 25, 2012 (UTC)

Well, as an answer, on one of the many 'Ask The Master' Tumblr Blogs (http://theworldshallbemine.tumblr.com/) There's a different character named Steve who was The Master in Abigail's body after the change. It states that she has a different personality than the other Masters due to Abigail being rich and feminine I guess. I know it's not Canon, but it's a possibility.

Common sense suggests that they don't. If the humans are being transformed into exact copies of the Master down to changing their body to be identical to his regardless of gender, I don't think any part of the original brain would be left. --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 21:30, August 31, 2018 (UTC)

Question:

Should we make a disambiguation page for the term "Master Race" as it's also used by the Daleks in Victory of the Daleks? Deathblade 100 ☎ 03:07, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

If there are only two "Master Race" articles across the DWU, then we don't need a disambiguation page, which require at least three items (see Tardis:Disambiguation#Disambiguation rules). However, this article probably needs a dab term. Shambala108 ☎ 03:35, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

Ah okay. Thanks for explaining that. Deathblade 100 ☎ 07:43, July 6, 2016 (UTC)