Forum:Book Plots: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:But many of the novel articles still need developing many are lacking detailed references and continuity sections. Many of the [[Short Trips (series)|Short Trips]], [[Virgin Decalogs]] and [[Big Finish Bernice Summerfield Series]] (short story anthologies) are lacking summaries of their short stories, the setting/year field in a lot of these short stories (within the infobox) is lacking any information. | :But many of the novel articles still need developing many are lacking detailed references and continuity sections. Many of the [[Short Trips (series)|Short Trips]], [[Virgin Decalogs]] and [[Big Finish Bernice Summerfield Series]] (short story anthologies) are lacking summaries of their short stories, the setting/year field in a lot of these short stories (within the infobox) is lacking any information. | ||
:Page counts (again within the infobox) is lacking on a lot of pages. (These are just the things I can think of off the top of my head though). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:04, November 28, 2009 (UTC) | :Page counts (again within the infobox) is lacking on a lot of pages. (These are just the things I can think of off the top of my head though). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:04, November 28, 2009 (UTC) | ||
Yeah...good point-[[User:Excalibur-117|Excalibur-117]] 14:09, November 28, 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:09, 28 November 2009
Index → Reference desk → Book Plots
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Right, I know I'm probally nitpicking, but seeing as we have little in the way to do except Dreamland and mantenice, couldn't we try to develope the pages about novels? Just a thought - Excalibur-117 18:49, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
- Well, little in the way to do is somewhat of an understatement, check out Tardis:To Do List if you want to see the long list of things that need doing, then of course there's the Wantedpages.
- The book plots are something I've considered, but not sure if they're needed. The Publisher's Summary (aka Blurb) does a relatively good job of summarising the story.
- It's just considering that we're currently lacking plots for several TV stories (that is unique plots separate from Wikipedia), and there are a rather large amounts of novels (NA, MA, BNA, EDA, PDA, TN, VD, ST, NSA, BFBS and TWN) they're all the main ranges of novels.
- But many of the novel articles still need developing many are lacking detailed references and continuity sections. Many of the Short Trips, Virgin Decalogs and Big Finish Bernice Summerfield Series (short story anthologies) are lacking summaries of their short stories, the setting/year field in a lot of these short stories (within the infobox) is lacking any information.
- Page counts (again within the infobox) is lacking on a lot of pages. (These are just the things I can think of off the top of my head though). --Tangerineduel 14:04, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
Yeah...good point-Excalibur-117 14:09, November 28, 2009 (UTC)