Not we: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "{{real world}} {{you may|Not-We|n1-the in-universe concept}} The term '''"not-we"''' is used by fandom to indicate the casual viewer of ''Doctor Who''. Sometimes, it simp...")
 
m (Bot: Cosmetic changes)
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{real world}}
{{real world}}
{{you may|Not-We|n1-the in-universe concept}}
{{you may|Not-We|n1=the in-universe concept}}
The term '''"not-we"''' is used by fandom to indicate the casual viewer of ''[[Doctor Who]]''. Sometimes, it simply means "anyone who is not an obsessive ''Doctor Who'' fan", and does not assume that the people described actually watch ''Doctor Who'' at all. The term is often used on internet forums in arguments where distinguishing between "hardcore" and casual fans is useful.<ref>[http://www.behindthesofa.org.uk/2010/01/return-of-the-fanking.html "Return of the Fan***king". ''Behind the Sofa''. 2 January 2012.]</ref>
The term '''"not we"''' (sometimes rendered '''Not We''' and '''not-we''') is used by fandom to indicate the casual viewer of ''[[Doctor Who]]''. Sometimes, it simply means "anyone who is not an obsessive ''Doctor Who'' fan", and does not assume that the people described actually watch ''Doctor Who'' at all. The term is often used on internet forums and podcasts in arguments where distinguishing between "hardcore" and casual fans is useful.<ref>[http://www.behindthesofa.org.uk/2010/01/return-of-the-fanking.html "Return of the Fan*** king". ''Behind the Sofa''. 2 January 2012.]</ref><ref>[http://veritypodcast.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/verity-episode-1-the-snowmen/ "The Snowmen". ''Verity!'' 2 January 2013. Reference at 5'7".]</ref> Popular ''Doctor Who'' forum [[Gallifrey Base]] has for years featured a thread in each of its episode discussion areas called, "What did the kids and the "Not We" think of <nowiki><insert name></nowiki>?" — which undoubtedly helps to reinforce the term in the minds of its users.<ref>[http://gallifreybase.com/forum/showthread.php?t=149835 Typical "Not We" thread at Gallifrey Base. Free registration required]</ref>
 
It derives from the [[Not-We]], a group of outsiders seen in ''[[Kinda (TV story)|Kinda]]''. Unlike the original term — which is hyphenated and fully capitalised in the [[Kinda (novelisation)|novelisation]] and had a mildly [[pejorative]] connotation — the fan term is inconsistently capitalised and hyphenated, and it's rarely, if ever, meant as an insult.


It derives from the [[Not-We]], a group of outsiders seen in ''[[Kinda (TV story)|Kinda]]''. Unlike the original term — which is fully capitalised in the [[Kinda (novelisation)|novelisation]] and had a mildly pejorative connotation — "not-we" is not usually capitalised, is not always hyphenated, and it's rarely, if ever, meant as an insult. 
== Footnotes ==
== Footnotes ==
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
[[category:Fan terminology]]
 
[[Category:Fan terminology]]

Latest revision as of 16:43, 26 February 2019

RealWorld.png
You may be looking for the in-universe concept.

The term "not we" (sometimes rendered Not We and not-we) is used by fandom to indicate the casual viewer of Doctor Who. Sometimes, it simply means "anyone who is not an obsessive Doctor Who fan", and does not assume that the people described actually watch Doctor Who at all. The term is often used on internet forums and podcasts in arguments where distinguishing between "hardcore" and casual fans is useful.[1][2] Popular Doctor Who forum Gallifrey Base has for years featured a thread in each of its episode discussion areas called, "What did the kids and the "Not We" think of <insert name>?" — which undoubtedly helps to reinforce the term in the minds of its users.[3]

It derives from the Not-We, a group of outsiders seen in Kinda. Unlike the original term — which is hyphenated and fully capitalised in the novelisation and had a mildly pejorative connotation — the fan term is inconsistently capitalised and hyphenated, and it's rarely, if ever, meant as an insult.

Footnotes[[edit] | [edit source]]