Tech, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, threadmoderator
115,904
edits
More actions
m
→Companion: fixing autocorrect error in my message (not changing message, just fixing what amounts to a typo)
No edit summary |
m (→Companion: fixing autocorrect error in my message (not changing message, just fixing what amounts to a typo)) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:: I would place her as a companion. In the story where she is introduced she's a companion from the start, even if she does turn out to be a plant. The whole point of her character is introducing a '''companion''' River hasn't heard of before, which ergo makes her a companion. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 17:36, June 26, 2019 (UTC) | :: I would place her as a companion. In the story where she is introduced she's a companion from the start, even if she does turn out to be a plant. The whole point of her character is introducing a '''companion''' River hasn't heard of before, which ergo makes her a companion. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 17:36, June 26, 2019 (UTC) | ||
::: She wouldn't be the first companion to secretly have it out for the Doctor. I agree, she’s very much introduced as such, and before | ::: She wouldn't be the first companion to secretly have it out for the Doctor. I agree, she’s very much introduced as such, and before her plot is revealed she and River talk about the experience of being a companion to the Doctor. There’s enough been a whole subplot where each is trying to undermine the other, ostensibly out of jealousy, and Brooke is said to have been travelling with the Doctor for a while, filling a role which she claims she's afraid she'll get replaced in by River. As far as the Fifth Doctor is concerned throughout her introduction, Brooke is his companion.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 19:42, June 26, 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::: Yes, that's true, and I think that is a very good argument in favour of her companion status, however I feel she should be considered a companion even if this weren't the case. That said, I am not familiar with the convention for such determinations. | :::: Yes, that's true, and I think that is a very good argument in favour of her companion status, however I feel she should be considered a companion even if this weren't the case. That said, I am not familiar with the convention for such determinations. | ||
::::Anyway, are there any objections to this? I know it was OncomingStorm12th who originally reverted their companion status, but we haven't had any input from them on this issue yet. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:39, June 28, 2019 (UTC) | ::::Anyway, are there any objections to this? I know it was OncomingStorm12th who originally reverted their companion status, but we haven't had any input from them on this issue yet. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:39, June 28, 2019 (UTC) | ||