Talk:City of Death (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (moved Talk:City of Death to Talk:City of Death (TV story): Acting on Forum:Story names should be automatically disambiguated; redirect for un-dab-ed name retained) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Momentary travels like that don't count. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 18:31, January 19, 2010 (UTC) | * Momentary travels like that don't count. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 18:31, January 19, 2010 (UTC) | ||
**I agree, though I can see that same argument being used to discount the "one-off companions" of the revived series, such as Adelaide Brooke. [[User:Spreee|Spreee]] 18:53, January 19, 2010 (UTC)Spreee | **I agree, though I can see that same argument being used to discount the "one-off companions" of the revived series, such as Adelaide Brooke. [[User:Spreee|Spreee]] 18:53, January 19, 2010 (UTC)Spreee | ||
==Scientific Inaccuracy?== | |||
I feel like it would be of some interest to mention ''somewhere'' on this page the scientific inaccuracy (from a real world point of view) in the given date for the first forms of life arising on Earth? I know one is prohibited from mentioning it in "Production errors" (as we cannot know whether the change to real world history was intentional or merely an oversight), but then, where? --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:12, September 1, 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:12, 1 September 2019
Although Duggan travels in the TARDIS at the end of the story, I'm not sure if he's considered a companion, so I left him off the list in the infobox. --Dr. Corpuscle 07:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Momentary travels like that don't count. 23skidoo 18:31, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, though I can see that same argument being used to discount the "one-off companions" of the revived series, such as Adelaide Brooke. Spreee 18:53, January 19, 2010 (UTC)Spreee
Scientific Inaccuracy?
I feel like it would be of some interest to mention somewhere on this page the scientific inaccuracy (from a real world point of view) in the given date for the first forms of life arising on Earth? I know one is prohibited from mentioning it in "Production errors" (as we cannot know whether the change to real world history was intentional or merely an oversight), but then, where? --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 22:12, September 1, 2019 (UTC)