User talk:VinJordan: Difference between revisions
(Welcome to Tardis!) |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the [[Tardis:Help| Help pages]], add a question to one of [[Special:Forum|the Forums]] or ask on [[User talk:Shambala108|my talk page]]. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:24, December 26, 2019 (UTC) | Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the [[Tardis:Help| Help pages]], add a question to one of [[Special:Forum|the Forums]] or ask on [[User talk:Shambala108|my talk page]]. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:24, December 26, 2019 (UTC) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Cybermen == | |||
Be that as it may, the term of "Cybermen" doesn't, I believe, actually appear in ''[[An Ordinary Man (novel)|An Ordinary Man]]''. We take a very strict view on this Wiki of sticking to what the text tells us. [[The Woman (The End of Time)]] isn't officially the Doctor's mother for us, that sort of thing. | |||
But either way, this Wiki cares very much about whether the use (minor or otherwise) of DWU concepts was specifically licensed. This is as distinct from whether they have been (or should be, or could be) prosecuted under U.K. or U.S. copyright law. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:37, May 1, 2020 (UTC) | |||
:Appreciate the response. However, the term Cybermen is indeed used within the text. It's the only reason I changed it on here. (One can safely assume it was used because it doesn't break any UK law.) {{unsigned|VinJordan}} | |||
::Isss it now. Hm. Apologies. But, well, as I said before, whether copyright law says something needs a license and whether this Wiki says something needs a license can be very different matters. I hesitate to start another [[Talk:Legacies (short story)|mess]] but this looks like something the Wiki will have to discuss at greater length. I think it's unlikely ''An Ordinary Man'' will be made invalid for something so small, but we may not accept a mention of "Cybermen" as referring to [[Cyberman|the DWU concept of a Cyberman]] if that concept wasn't properly licensed. This might, perhaps counterintuitively, lead to the creation of [[Cyberman (An Ordinary Man)]] for the "Candy Jar-created" species. We shall see. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:46, May 1, 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:46, 1 May 2020
Thanks for your edits! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is a great time to have joined us, because now you can play the Game of Rassilon with us and win cool stuff! Well, okay, badges. That have no monetary value. And that largely only you can see. But still: they're cool!
We've got a couple of important quirks for a Wikia wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.
British English, please
We generally use British English round these parts, so if you're American, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:
- the listing of all our help, policy and guideline pages
- our Manual of Style
- our image use policy
- our user page policy
- a list of people whose job it is to help you
If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! — you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:
Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my talk page. Shambala108 ☎ 15:24, December 26, 2019 (UTC)
Cybermen[[edit source]]
Be that as it may, the term of "Cybermen" doesn't, I believe, actually appear in An Ordinary Man. We take a very strict view on this Wiki of sticking to what the text tells us. The Woman (The End of Time) isn't officially the Doctor's mother for us, that sort of thing.
But either way, this Wiki cares very much about whether the use (minor or otherwise) of DWU concepts was specifically licensed. This is as distinct from whether they have been (or should be, or could be) prosecuted under U.K. or U.S. copyright law. --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 02:37, May 1, 2020 (UTC)
- Appreciate the response. However, the term Cybermen is indeed used within the text. It's the only reason I changed it on here. (One can safely assume it was used because it doesn't break any UK law.) – The preceding unsigned comment was added by VinJordan (talk • contribs) .
- Isss it now. Hm. Apologies. But, well, as I said before, whether copyright law says something needs a license and whether this Wiki says something needs a license can be very different matters. I hesitate to start another mess but this looks like something the Wiki will have to discuss at greater length. I think it's unlikely An Ordinary Man will be made invalid for something so small, but we may not accept a mention of "Cybermen" as referring to the DWU concept of a Cyberman if that concept wasn't properly licensed. This might, perhaps counterintuitively, lead to the creation of Cyberman (An Ordinary Man) for the "Candy Jar-created" species. We shall see. --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 02:46, May 1, 2020 (UTC)