Talk:Arcan system: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Actually, there was. "No citation", in accordance to [[Tardis:Citation]]. [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] ([[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|talk]]) 20:15, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | :Actually, there was. "No citation", in accordance to [[Tardis:Citation]]. [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] ([[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|talk]]) 20:15, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:Also, might I add, no pages link to this one, making it a [[Tardis:Orphan|orphan page]]. While not a delete-worthy problem, it should be amended as well. [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] ([[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|talk]]) 20:20, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | :Also, might I add, no pages link to this one, making it a [[Tardis:Orphan|orphan page]]. While not a delete-worthy problem, it should be amended as well. [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] ([[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|talk]]) 20:20, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: Yes, I did so because there was no source given for the information above Behind the scenes. I wasn't sure of a better tag, but it can easily be removed if that issue is resolved. The behind the scenes mentions the ''[[The Torchwood Archives]]'', which is currently not a considered a valid source so it couldn't be the source for the above information, unless the article is recategorised as invalid. (Although I think from the Amazon preview pages and publisher's summary, as a story told through in-universe documents a la ''[[Apocrypha Bipedium (short story)|Apocrypha Bipedium]]'', ''[[The Time Lord Letters (novel)|The Time Lord Letters]]'', ''[[The Secret Lives of Monsters (novel)|The Secret Lives of Monsters]]'' it ''might'' be worth re-evaluation. But I don't have the full book and this isn't the place so that's a thought for another day :P) [[User:Toqgers|Toqgers]] [[User talk:Toqgers|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] | |||
Revision as of 20:36, 5 May 2020
There was no explanation given for a recently added deletion tag. Xx-connor-xX ☎ 19:59, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, there was. "No citation", in accordance to Tardis:Citation. OncomingStorm12th (talk) 20:15, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Also, might I add, no pages link to this one, making it a orphan page. While not a delete-worthy problem, it should be amended as well. OncomingStorm12th (talk) 20:20, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I did so because there was no source given for the information above Behind the scenes. I wasn't sure of a better tag, but it can easily be removed if that issue is resolved. The behind the scenes mentions the The Torchwood Archives, which is currently not a considered a valid source so it couldn't be the source for the above information, unless the article is recategorised as invalid. (Although I think from the Amazon preview pages and publisher's summary, as a story told through in-universe documents a la Apocrypha Bipedium, The Time Lord Letters, The Secret Lives of Monsters it might be worth re-evaluation. But I don't have the full book and this isn't the place so that's a thought for another day :P) Toqgers ☎
