Talk:Arcan system: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Deletion tag == | |||
There was no explanation given for a recently added deletion tag. [[User:Xx-connor-xX|Xx-connor-xX]] [[User talk:Xx-connor-xX|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:59, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | There was no explanation given for a recently added deletion tag. [[User:Xx-connor-xX|Xx-connor-xX]] [[User talk:Xx-connor-xX|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:59, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:Actually, there was. "No citation", in accordance to [[Tardis:Citation]]. [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] ([[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|talk]]) 20:15, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | :Actually, there was. "No citation", in accordance to [[Tardis:Citation]]. [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] ([[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|talk]]) 20:15, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
:::Sorry about that Toqgers, I misunderstood the “No citation” bit. [[User:Xx-connor-xX|Xx-connor-xX]] [[User talk:Xx-connor-xX|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:43, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | :::Sorry about that Toqgers, I misunderstood the “No citation” bit. [[User:Xx-connor-xX|Xx-connor-xX]] [[User talk:Xx-connor-xX|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:43, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::: Nah it's cool! I'll make sure to use a more appropriate template next time if there is one. Take care! [[User:Toqgers|Toqgers]] [[User talk:Toqgers|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:48, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | :::: Nah it's cool! I'll make sure to use a more appropriate template next time if there is one. Take care! [[User:Toqgers|Toqgers]] [[User talk:Toqgers|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:48, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::::No, Toggers, you used the template correctly with the correct reasoning. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:54, May 5, 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:54, 5 May 2020
Deletion tag
There was no explanation given for a recently added deletion tag. Xx-connor-xX ☎ 19:59, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, there was. "No citation", in accordance to Tardis:Citation. OncomingStorm12th (talk) 20:15, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Also, might I add, no pages link to this one, making it a orphan page. While not a delete-worthy problem, it should be amended as well. OncomingStorm12th (talk) 20:20, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I did so because there was no source given for the information above Behind the scenes. I wasn't sure of a better tag, but it can easily be removed if that issue is resolved. The behind the scenes mentions the The Torchwood Archives, which is currently not a considered a valid source so it couldn't be the source for the above information, unless the article is recategorised as invalid. (Although I think from the Amazon preview pages and publisher's summary, as a story told through in-universe documents a la Apocrypha Bipedium, The Time Lord Letters, The Secret Lives of Monsters it might be worth re-evaluation. But I don't have the full book and this isn't the place so that's a thought for another day :P) Toqgers ☎
- Sorry about that Toqgers, I misunderstood the “No citation” bit. Xx-connor-xX ☎ 20:43, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Nah it's cool! I'll make sure to use a more appropriate template next time if there is one. Take care! Toqgers ☎ 21:48, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
- No, Toggers, you used the template correctly with the correct reasoning. Shambala108 ☎ 21:54, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Nah it's cool! I'll make sure to use a more appropriate template next time if there is one. Take care! Toqgers ☎ 21:48, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry about that Toqgers, I misunderstood the “No citation” bit. Xx-connor-xX ☎ 20:43, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I did so because there was no source given for the information above Behind the scenes. I wasn't sure of a better tag, but it can easily be removed if that issue is resolved. The behind the scenes mentions the The Torchwood Archives, which is currently not a considered a valid source so it couldn't be the source for the above information, unless the article is recategorised as invalid. (Although I think from the Amazon preview pages and publisher's summary, as a story told through in-universe documents a la Apocrypha Bipedium, The Time Lord Letters, The Secret Lives of Monsters it might be worth re-evaluation. But I don't have the full book and this isn't the place so that's a thought for another day :P) Toqgers ☎
