Talk:The Time Lord Letters (novel): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) (→Rename) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::I also dispute that it's the same thing ''Brief Encounters'' and ''The Blogs of Doom'', in that those were series with individual installments released months or even years apart, and by different authors. By contrast, ''The Time Lord Letters'' has not, to my knowledge, been released as anything else than a whole object. That doesn't mean it can't be an anthology — but ''BE'' and ''TBoD'' are not, I think, the closest precedents you could find. To play devil's advocate against my own position, I'd say you'd be better off looking at something like ''[[The Book of the Peace (anthology)|The Book of the Peace]]'' with its "[[Pre-narrative Briefings (short story)|briefing segment]]" interludes. And even that's not quite right for the kind of thing you're arguing that ''Time Lord Letters'' is. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:15, July 18, 2020 (UTC) | ::I also dispute that it's the same thing ''Brief Encounters'' and ''The Blogs of Doom'', in that those were series with individual installments released months or even years apart, and by different authors. By contrast, ''The Time Lord Letters'' has not, to my knowledge, been released as anything else than a whole object. That doesn't mean it can't be an anthology — but ''BE'' and ''TBoD'' are not, I think, the closest precedents you could find. To play devil's advocate against my own position, I'd say you'd be better off looking at something like ''[[The Book of the Peace (anthology)|The Book of the Peace]]'' with its "[[Pre-narrative Briefings (short story)|briefing segment]]" interludes. And even that's not quite right for the kind of thing you're arguing that ''Time Lord Letters'' is. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:15, July 18, 2020 (UTC) | ||
<edit conflict> | |||
Regardless, [[User:Borisashton]] is correct, and it's ok for experienced users to remind other users about '''policy''', as long as they don't confuse other users about their status. (Admins can't be everywhere at once.) It's not '''opinion''', but rather is '''policy''', that changes cannot be made while an issue is under discussion. | |||
''The Slow Path'' has been deleted for now; if it is determined that it can be considered a separate story, it can be restored. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:23, July 18, 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:23, 18 July 2020
Rename
This release is an anthology, rather than a novel, as it is a collection of short stories in the form of letters and writings by the Doctor. Each short story deserves a page of its own - similar to Brief Encounter and The Blogs of Doom. Xx-connor-xX ☎ 11:11, July 6, 2020 (UTC)
- You should not have created The Slow Path... without discussion. I don't have the book on me right now but from memory I'm not entirely convinced that some of the letters would pass rule 1 if we classified them separately. --Borisashton ☎ 15:14, July 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm with Boris on this one. The epistolary novel (a book made up of a succession of increasingly connected letters from various characters within the diegesis) is an established literary form, and doesn't mean the various "collected texts" are short stories in their own right. Is Bram Stoker's Dracula an anthology now? --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 23:03, July 17, 2020 (UTC)
- Boris, you are not an admin - putting across your opinion is fine but stating that I should not have done something is not your job. All of these instalments are individual stories, just like Brief Encounters / the Blogs of Doom. And as for you, Scrooge, how are any of these letters “increasingly connected”? They are all standalone. Xx-connor-xX ☎ 00:07, July 18, 2020 (UTC)
- It's not Boris's job to forbid you from doing something, but surely advice isn't prohibited. Pointing out what T:BOUND says is not the same thing as trying to enforce it, and the fact is, T:BOUND states pretty clearly that you can't both open a discussion about something and already start making edits based on one of the proposals in that discussion.
- As for the "connected" phrase, I was referring to the general definition of an epistolary novel, not making a definitive statements about The Time Lord Letters itself. It seems to me like the whole is meant to be greater than the sum of its parts — drawing up a general portrait of the Doctor and their life through a series of snapshots.
- I also dispute that it's the same thing Brief Encounters and The Blogs of Doom, in that those were series with individual installments released months or even years apart, and by different authors. By contrast, The Time Lord Letters has not, to my knowledge, been released as anything else than a whole object. That doesn't mean it can't be an anthology — but BE and TBoD are not, I think, the closest precedents you could find. To play devil's advocate against my own position, I'd say you'd be better off looking at something like The Book of the Peace with its "briefing segment" interludes. And even that's not quite right for the kind of thing you're arguing that Time Lord Letters is. --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 00:15, July 18, 2020 (UTC)
<edit conflict>
Regardless, User:Borisashton is correct, and it's ok for experienced users to remind other users about policy, as long as they don't confuse other users about their status. (Admins can't be everywhere at once.) It's not opinion, but rather is policy, that changes cannot be made while an issue is under discussion.
The Slow Path has been deleted for now; if it is determined that it can be considered a separate story, it can be restored. Shambala108 ☎ 00:23, July 18, 2020 (UTC)