User talk:Stillnotginger: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Line 28: Line 28:


:Thank you for the excellent and extensive criticisms of the mistaken actions I took on the Jo Grant page. I am sorry for the work I created for you, I thought reverting to the original text would be as easy as clicking the undo button in the page history. Please note, I did stop editing pages after questioning my own actions and asking for help. I will endeavour to learn more on this subject before submitting any other opinions. --[[User:Stillnotginger|Stillnotginger]] 17:10, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
:Thank you for the excellent and extensive criticisms of the mistaken actions I took on the Jo Grant page. I am sorry for the work I created for you, I thought reverting to the original text would be as easy as clicking the undo button in the page history. Please note, I did stop editing pages after questioning my own actions and asking for help. I will endeavour to learn more on this subject before submitting any other opinions. --[[User:Stillnotginger|Stillnotginger]] 17:10, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
== Catchephrases, idiosychronastisties, running gags and so on ==
I love the idea. But it's going to be hard to get feedback when it's just an idea. Put together a first-draft sample of what the page will look like as a subpage under your userspace (can you do that here, like on Wikipedia?) and I'm sure you'll get a lot more input. I might even create an account to help out. :) --[[Special:Contributions/99.20.129.165|99.20.129.165]] 08:15, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:15, 3 March 2010

Welcome to the
Site-logo.png
• Stillnotginger •

Thanks for your recent edits! I'm Jimbo, your robot wiki representative! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is actually a great time to have joined, because we're now fully independent, and working on a host of new features!

We've got a couple of important quirks for a fan written wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.

British English, please

We generally use British English 'round these parts, so if you use another form of English, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.

Spoilers aren't cool

We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.

Other useful stuff

Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:

If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! —  you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:
~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask an admin.


Thank you.

Thank you for the warm welcome, it's great to be here.

I appologise in advance for any poor conduct (which would all be unintend) and any errors in editing technique etc, etc...

This is a great wiki and an excellent site for any Doctor Who fan.

Stillnotginger 16:32, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Linking to wikipedia

Hi, in order to link to Wikipedia articles within text you don't need to add the whole web address just type for instance to The Moonstone: [[Wikipedia:The Moonstone|The Moonstone]] which gives you The Moonstone. --Tangerineduel 13:56, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Brilliant --Stillnotginger 14:20, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Is it possible to link to a specific catagory/section of a wikipedia article? or a Tardis Index File article? For Instance: something on bees; can I link directly to section 1.3? --Stillnotginger 14:44, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Sure is: more stuff on bees
That's done with: [[Wikipedia:Conservation biology#Insects and other groups|more stuff on bees]]
Hope that helps. -- sulfur 14:52, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Totally. Many thanks. --Stillnotginger 21:37, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Commas

Hiya. You requested a review of your understanding of how commas should be used. That review has been completed at Talk:Jo Grant. The result? Please stop editing until you get a better grasp of how commas are actually supposed to work. I'm not saying that to be mean. Rather, I'm being truthful. Currently, you lack a sound enough grasp of correct comma usage to help us with editing. If you continue with efforts like those you gave at Jo Grant, you're going to harm the quality of articles here.

Fortunately, it's quite easy to get up to speed with commas. There are numerous guides on the internet. Here's one of the simplest. Please feel free to continue editing after you've read and understood that article. CzechOut | 16:52, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the excellent and extensive criticisms of the mistaken actions I took on the Jo Grant page. I am sorry for the work I created for you, I thought reverting to the original text would be as easy as clicking the undo button in the page history. Please note, I did stop editing pages after questioning my own actions and asking for help. I will endeavour to learn more on this subject before submitting any other opinions. --Stillnotginger 17:10, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Catchephrases, idiosychronastisties, running gags and so on

I love the idea. But it's going to be hard to get feedback when it's just an idea. Put together a first-draft sample of what the page will look like as a subpage under your userspace (can you do that here, like on Wikipedia?) and I'm sure you'll get a lot more input. I might even create an account to help out. :) --99.20.129.165 08:15, March 3, 2010 (UTC)