Talk:Joan Redfern: Difference between revisions
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
fair enough i suppose[[Special:Contributions/24.215.188.166|24.215.188.166]]<sup>[[User talk:24.215.188.166#top|talk to me]]</sup> 08:15, May 1, 2013 (UTC) | fair enough i suppose[[Special:Contributions/24.215.188.166|24.215.188.166]]<sup>[[User talk:24.215.188.166#top|talk to me]]</sup> 08:15, May 1, 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Question == | |||
This page is not needed as it is already under the title [[Joan Redfern (TV character)]] saying exactly the same--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]] 21:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
::It doesn't say the same thing, and they are two different characters. While one is based on the other they react and interact with Smith and other characters in a different way. Joan in the novel interacts with [[Bernice Summerfield]] in a very different way to Joan in the TV story. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 22:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Merger == | == Merger == | ||
Having different pages for Joan Redfern's two appearances made sense with the state of the wiki in 2007 and 2013, but since [[Thread:232143]]'s positive ruling on novelisation validity, we have had quite a lot of practice at constructing elaborate "according to another account" arrangements. Is it time for a merger of this page and her equally-awkwardly-dabbed twin [[Joan Redfern (novel character)]] into the singular [[Joan Redfern]] at long last? – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 07:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC) | Having different pages for Joan Redfern's two appearances made sense with the state of the wiki in 2007 and 2013, but since [[Thread:232143]]'s positive ruling on novelisation validity, we have had quite a lot of practice at constructing elaborate "according to another account" arrangements. Is it time for a merger of this page and her equally-awkwardly-dabbed twin [[Joan Redfern (novel character)]] into the singular [[Joan Redfern]] at long last? – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 07:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:47, 28 April 2021
Seventh Doctor novel
Should Joan Redfern as the one base off the one in the possible discontinue Seventh doctor novel. i mean they have the same name and were tecnically lover of a then human doctorGhidorafour ☎ 04:30, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Because Joan Redfern (TV character) and Joan Redfern (novel character) each meet a different Doctor, this wiki considers them as two separate people. I hope that answers your question. Shambala108 ☎ 05:21, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
fair enough i suppose24.215.188.166talk to me 08:15, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
Question
This page is not needed as it is already under the title Joan Redfern (TV character) saying exactly the same--Skittles the hog 21:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- It doesn't say the same thing, and they are two different characters. While one is based on the other they react and interact with Smith and other characters in a different way. Joan in the novel interacts with Bernice Summerfield in a very different way to Joan in the TV story. --Tangerineduel 22:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Merger
Having different pages for Joan Redfern's two appearances made sense with the state of the wiki in 2007 and 2013, but since Thread:232143's positive ruling on novelisation validity, we have had quite a lot of practice at constructing elaborate "according to another account" arrangements. Is it time for a merger of this page and her equally-awkwardly-dabbed twin Joan Redfern (novel character) into the singular Joan Redfern at long last? – n8 (☎) 07:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
