Talk:Interweb of Fear (home video)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ArchPage}} | |||
== Documentary == | == Documentary == | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
I've opened a discussion at [[Thread:224568]] to discuss this video's validity. All further comments should be made there. And for the record, inclusion debates must be posted at [[Board:Inclusion debates]] so that they get a wider audience than just a talk page. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:51, September 22, 2017 (UTC) | I've opened a discussion at [[Thread:224568]] to discuss this video's validity. All further comments should be made there. And for the record, inclusion debates must be posted at [[Board:Inclusion debates]] so that they get a wider audience than just a talk page. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:51, September 22, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:: I wish we still had the Forum archives to check, but noting for posterity's sake that if I recall correctly, the finding of the thread was that it was narrative enough, but was a parody and therefore failed Rule 4 of [[T:VS]]. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:07, 2 June 2021
 |
This page is an archive. Please do not make any edits here. Edit the active conversation only. |
|---|
Documentary[[edit source]]
I would argue that with the archive footage chosen and the narration at the time the footage was playing it has a valid narrative and therefore should merit inclusion. --Borisashton ☎ 19:37, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
- It just features a few clips in the documentary like Thirty Years in the TARDIS, they are just featured. No minisode was featured. 82.3.146.201talk to me 19:42, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
- When the narrator says 'We had a problem' (or something similar) archive footage of a man getting murdered by the War Machines plays. This seem like a narrative (albeit a very loose one). --Borisashton ☎ 19:48, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
- But it's still part of the documentary, joined together - unlike other minisodes featured in documentaries. 82.3.146.201talk to me 19:51, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
- As I said above there is a narrative, which means it's a story. From what I can tell passes the four little rules due to this. --Borisashton ☎ 19:57, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
- In a documentary, it doesn't warrant a separate page, it's unwatchable individually. 82.3.146.201talk to me 20:06, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
- I've just had time to watch the documentary (with just the bits with the archive footage from The War Machines) and it makes sense on it's own as a brief history of the BBC website with the archive footage linking the narration. --Borisashton ☎ 16:15, February 4, 2017 (UTC)
- In a documentary, it doesn't warrant a separate page, it's unwatchable individually. 82.3.146.201talk to me 20:06, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
- As I said above there is a narrative, which means it's a story. From what I can tell passes the four little rules due to this. --Borisashton ☎ 19:57, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
- But it's still part of the documentary, joined together - unlike other minisodes featured in documentaries. 82.3.146.201talk to me 19:51, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
- When the narrator says 'We had a problem' (or something similar) archive footage of a man getting murdered by the War Machines plays. This seem like a narrative (albeit a very loose one). --Borisashton ☎ 19:48, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
I've opened a discussion at Thread:224568 to discuss this video's validity. All further comments should be made there. And for the record, inclusion debates must be posted at Board:Inclusion debates so that they get a wider audience than just a talk page. Shambala108 ☎ 23:51, September 22, 2017 (UTC)
- I wish we still had the Forum archives to check, but noting for posterity's sake that if I recall correctly, the finding of the thread was that it was narrative enough, but was a parody and therefore failed Rule 4 of T:VS. Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 13:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
