Trusted
49,174
edits
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
: Counterpoints | : Counterpoints | ||
# Well, the policeman in ''AUC'' was never actually ''shown'' to leave Totter's Lane, was he? It would make sense that he was still vicinity to hear Ian and Barbara getting into the kerfuffle with the Doctor and started making a lot of noise, and returning just as the TARDIS dematerialised. | # Well, the policeman in ''AUC'' was never actually ''shown'' to leave Totter's Lane, was he? It would make sense that he was still in the vicinity to hear Ian and Barbara getting into the kerfuffle with the Doctor and started making a lot of noise, and returning just as the TARDIS dematerialised. | ||
# And? The author of [[PROSE]]: ''[[Shroud of Sorrow (novel)|Shroud of Sorrow]]'' could've easily used [[PROSE]]: ''[[Who Killed Kennedy (novel)|Who Killed Kennedy]]'' to date the events. That's not a issue, surely, one story being in continuity with another? | # And? The author of [[PROSE]]: ''[[Shroud of Sorrow (novel)|Shroud of Sorrow]]'' could've easily used [[PROSE]]: ''[[Who Killed Kennedy (novel)|Who Killed Kennedy]]'' to date the events. That's not a issue, surely, one story being in continuity with another? | ||
# I had thought that some sources had stated that Fred had portrayed the policeman in the final edition? | # I had thought that some sources had stated that Fred had portrayed the policeman in the final edition? |