Talk:White Supreme Dalek: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Look, if we all agree ''that's fine''. It's settled. Lets create that page! [[User:Batmanboy|Batmanboy]] 18:06, April 20, 2010 (UTC) 19:06 20th April 2010 | Look, if we all agree ''that's fine''. It's settled. Lets create that page! [[User:Batmanboy|Batmanboy]] 18:06, April 20, 2010 (UTC) 19:06 20th April 2010 | ||
This page is useless. We already have this information on the page it should be on - [[Dalek Supreme]]. Not once before has someone found a need to make pages for individual Supremes. [[User:The Brig|The Brig]] 17:34, April 21, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:34, 21 April 2010
Name / Delete?
This creature already covered at Dalek Supreme#Dalek Revival, and in a way I think that's better. It is just the latest of the Dalek Supremes. Calling it "White Supreme Dalek" I think introduces conjecture, because "white" isn't a part of its onscreen name; that's just description based on visual inspection. I think this article should either be deleted, or renamed Supreme Dalek (Victory of the Daleks), and then the info at Dalek Supreme should be moved here. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 14:04, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
Agreed, and I made the flipping page!
- If you agree, why'd you remove the delete and conjecture tags? Please don't remove tags like that without consensus. The point of the tags is to encourage discussion here, and they can't just be removed unilaterally by you. They'll get removed when the matters they flag are revolved. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 16:00, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
Look, if we all agree that's fine. It's settled. Lets create that page! Batmanboy 18:06, April 20, 2010 (UTC) 19:06 20th April 2010
This page is useless. We already have this information on the page it should be on - Dalek Supreme. Not once before has someone found a need to make pages for individual Supremes. The Brig 17:34, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
