User talk:SegaStoner: Difference between revisions
SegaStoner (talk | contribs) (Response) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
NateBumber (talk | contribs) (adding unsigned) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
As someone who represents BBV on social media and forums, could you clarify if this matches BBV's understanding of the legal situation? – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 16:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC) | As someone who represents BBV on social media and forums, could you clarify if this matches BBV's understanding of the legal situation? – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 16:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
Still licensed until (currently) the end of 2022. | Still licensed until (currently) the end of 2022. {{unsigned|TheSegaStoner}} | ||
Revision as of 20:55, 16 August 2022
Recent edits
Hi Trevor, just a note from a fellow writer and non-admin: before you continue editing Hellscape-related pages, I recommend reading over the rules here, especially Tardis:Don't wikify your own material. It's been very helpful to me in the past!
While you're here, I'm hoping to get some clarity on the licensing situation, since you're right that information is nebulous right now. Here's a quote from the source cited on Faction Paradox (series), which you removed as "false":
So the Faction Paradox stuff is tricky. They [BBV] were told in October of last year [2021] that they were losing the license and that they could only release what they currently had in production (and that it would have to be done by the end of the year). This extension was granted because Baggs supposedly had "several things in the works".
As someone who represents BBV on social media and forums, could you clarify if this matches BBV's understanding of the legal situation? – n8 (☎) 16:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Still licensed until (currently) the end of 2022. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheSegaStoner (talk • contribs) .
