Template talk:DWVG: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "== Unnecessary separation == Honestly, I don't believe the sorting of the video games in this template is in the best interests of our readers. To them, whether or not something is a valid source is meaningless, especially in a real world context such as a navbox, as not only is validity an internal Wiki solution to figuring out which sources we can and can't write articles with, the pages in the navbox is essentially a "see more" type of thing, where validit...") |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Unnecessary separation == | == Unnecessary separation == | ||
Honestly, I don't believe the sorting of the video games in this template is in the best interests of our readers. To them, whether or not something is [[T:VALID|a valid source]] is meaningless, especially in a real world context such as a navbox, as not only is validity an internal Wiki solution to figuring out which sources we can and can't write articles with, the pages in the navbox is essentially a "see more" type of thing, where validity would be completely irrelevant even ''if'' we decided to use T:VS to write real world pages. I propose the change is reverted. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 22:02, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | Honestly, I don't believe the sorting of the video games in this template is in the best interests of our readers. To them, whether or not something is [[T:VALID|a valid source]] is meaningless, especially in a real world context such as a navbox, as not only is validity an internal Wiki solution to figuring out which sources we can and can't write articles with, the pages in the navbox is essentially a "see more" type of thing, where validity would be completely irrelevant even ''if'' we decided to use T:VS to write real world pages. I propose the change is reverted. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 22:02, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
:Agree. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:04, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
::Very much agree. I've seen some people online confuse our internal metrics on validity for being a new form of "canon". We should do everything we can to squash that particular notion. (Obviously we're already trying, but the more we do the better.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:08, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:08, 4 December 2022
Unnecessary separation[[edit source]]
Honestly, I don't believe the sorting of the video games in this template is in the best interests of our readers. To them, whether or not something is a valid source is meaningless, especially in a real world context such as a navbox, as not only is validity an internal Wiki solution to figuring out which sources we can and can't write articles with, the pages in the navbox is essentially a "see more" type of thing, where validity would be completely irrelevant even if we decided to use T:VS to write real world pages. I propose the change is reverted.
22:02, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Agree. Shambala108 ☎ 23:04, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
