Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,218
edits
More actions
Forum:Temporary forums/An update to T:VS (view source)
Revision as of 18:09, 11 January 2023
, 11 January 2023no edit summary
(Created page with "{{retitle|:Slot ???: "Rule 4 by proxy": a necessar update to T:VS}} == "Rule 4 by proxy": a necessary update to T:VS == Within hours of Tardis:Temporary forums being activated, it began filling up with suggestions that we redeem all sorts of things from ''Scream of the Shalka (webcast)'' to ''Vienna (series)'' from {{tlx|invalid}} status. Now, any one of these cases might have some hitherto-undocumented aspect which would justify their validity under the cu...") Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
After the initial slate of validations on this thread, any further validations on this basis ''would'' have to go through their own inclusion debates; but as I said, I believe a lot of the proposed inclusion debates currently engorging [[Tardis:Temporary forums#Proposed threads]] fall so straightforwardly within this proposal that they could be validated straightaway if consensus around my proposal builds. I will include an explanatory table here. If any of the examples below are controversial in ways not directly related to the heart of my proposal, they will be retracted and left off to their own threads ''after'' the proposal is enshrined into policy. (This is also why I've left out stories whose invalidity arguably rests on more than ordinary Rule 4 concerns, like ''[[The Skivers (audio skit)|The Skivers]]''.) | After the initial slate of validations on this thread, any further validations on this basis ''would'' have to go through their own inclusion debates; but as I said, I believe a lot of the proposed inclusion debates currently engorging [[Tardis:Temporary forums#Proposed threads]] fall so straightforwardly within this proposal that they could be validated straightaway if consensus around my proposal builds. I will include an explanatory table here. If any of the examples below are controversial in ways not directly related to the heart of my proposal, they will be retracted and left off to their own threads ''after'' the proposal is enshrined into policy. (This is also why I've left out stories whose invalidity arguably rests on more than ordinary Rule 4 concerns, like ''[[The Skivers (audio skit)|The Skivers]]''.) | ||
(Also of note is ''[[The Curse of Fatal Death (TV story)|The Curse of Fatal Death]]'', currently {{tlx|invalid}} but which, according to [[User:Najawin]], may have some additional evidence that would force us to invalidate again once examined under current Rule 4 policy. It is notoriously referenced as a possible future in ''[[The Tomorrow Windows (novel)|The Tomorrow Windows]]'', and its continuity regarding Tersurus is referenced in ''[[The Taking of Planet 5 (novel)|The Taking of Planet 5]]'' as a part of the mainstream DWU's history.) | (Also of note is ''[[The Curse of Fatal Death (TV story)|The Curse of Fatal Death]]'', not currently {{tlx|invalid}} but which, according to [[User:Najawin]], may have some additional evidence that would force us to invalidate again once examined under current Rule 4 policy. It is notoriously referenced as a possible future in ''[[The Tomorrow Windows (novel)|The Tomorrow Windows]]'', and its continuity regarding Tersurus is referenced in ''[[The Taking of Planet 5 (novel)|The Taking of Planet 5]]'' as a part of the mainstream DWU's history.) | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||