Talk:The Master (Terror of the Autons): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Harold Saxon: 20th/*19th | Harold Saxon: 20th/*19th | ||
How's that sound? | How's that sound? Note that there may have been unrecorded versions, eg. versions between Delgado and Tersurus (Making the UNIT years Master not the 12th), or versions between Tremas and the version executed on Skaro (Making said version higher than the 15th/14th). It's all very confusing, but I hope this will help put versions of the Master in slightly better perspective. | ||
[[User:Sorryaboutthatchief|Sorryaboutthatchief]] 05:25, April 30, 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Naming== | ==Naming== |
Revision as of 05:25, 30 April 2010
A Theory
I have an interesting theory. The Master of Tersurus (Spelling?) was to be the 13th incarnation, correct? Since he had used up twelve regenerations, that would make him the 13th Master (He doesn't have to regenerate to become his original self). Therefore, does that make Delgado's Master the 12th?
If so, then listen to what I've come up with:
Roger Delgado: 12th Master
Tersurus: 13th
Tremas: 14th
Unnamed version seen in beginning of the film on Skaro: 15th (*May be Tremas; making it still 14th)
Posessing Morphant/Skaronian Snake-thing: 16th/*15th
Bruce: 17th/*16th
Version that fought in Time War: 18th/*17th
Proffeser Yana: 19th/*18th
Harold Saxon: 20th/*19th
How's that sound? Note that there may have been unrecorded versions, eg. versions between Delgado and Tersurus (Making the UNIT years Master not the 12th), or versions between Tremas and the version executed on Skaro (Making said version higher than the 15th/14th). It's all very confusing, but I hope this will help put versions of the Master in slightly better perspective. Sorryaboutthatchief 05:25, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
Naming
Should This be changed to "The Master (Roger Delgado)" ? Quark16 16:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- That would just make it even more out-of-universe. -<Azes13 16:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Seconded. --Tangerineduel 16:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
I think its a better idea .. "The UNIT years" sounds very silly to me ... Quark16 18:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- It may be a vague name , but The Master (UNIT years) is an in-universe article, every other character is written in-universe, no characters are identified by the actor playing them as, for instance they are not playing them in ever instance of the Master (UNIT years), their likeness is featured in those stories but the actor is not. --Tangerineduel 03:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- The Master (UNIT years) is an inaccurate name. About half of the twentieth century, and the begginning of the twenty first century could be considered "UNIT years", in universe, as UNIT still existed. This name could describe any incarnation of the master that came to Earth while UNIT existed. Also, this Master did not only exist in the "UNIT years." He has been in episodes, such as Frontier in Space, and Colony in Space, that take place in the future, in a time when UNIT may not exist.Icecreamdif 21:51, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- See Tangerinduel's explanination above and the title UNIT years refers to the earth based episodes, which out weighs the space bounded stories (Two space stories as opposed to the six earth bound stories) Bigshowbower 07:01, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- If the title is supposed to be from an in-universe perspective, then this title is wrong. In-universe, the Master did not only exist when he encountered the Doctor. He was a timelord, who travelled through time, and occasionally visited the "Unit years." This title claims that this Master only existed in the "UNIT years," which is wrong.Icecreamdif 02:43, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
- This is true. Going by his appearance he first meets the Doctor in The Dark Path or there abouts. The UNIT years title is a thematic title and represents his motivations and characteristics during a set period of time as we don't have another thematic hook to wrap up the article under. --Tangerineduel 04:02, September 22, 2009 (UTC)