Trusted
49,535
edits
Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Article title is offensive == | == Article title is offensive == | ||
The article title is offensive and I request "mythology" in brackets be removed from it. [[Special:Contributions/54.252.166.176|54.252.166.176]]<sup>[[User talk:54.252.166.176#top|talk to me]]</sup> 03:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC) | The article title is offensive and I request "mythology" in brackets be removed from it. [[Special:Contributions/54.252.166.176|54.252.166.176]]<sup>[[User talk:54.252.166.176#top|talk to me]]</sup> 03:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
:::Wait, are we actually discussing this? These straightforwardly '''''are''''' instances of mythology. This is arguably a necessary component of them being part of a religious tradition - mythology has a real meaning that's not just pejorative. It's neither editorializing nor insensitive, it's true. Arguably it's ''overly technical'', but, you know, look at where we are, and see our (still unresolved) discussion at [[Talk:Queer representation in Doctor Who]]. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC) | :::Wait, are we actually discussing this? These straightforwardly '''''are''''' instances of mythology. This is arguably a necessary component of them being part of a religious tradition - mythology has a real meaning that's not just pejorative. It's neither editorializing nor insensitive, it's true. Arguably it's ''overly technical'', but, you know, look at where we are, and see our (still unresolved) discussion at [[Talk:Queer representation in Doctor Who]]. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: No matter what dab term we use, I don't feel okay about certain gods being "exempt" from it, as I don't think it is within our right to say that one deity is "truer" than another. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 02:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC) |