emailconfirmed, Administrators
15,041
edits
Tag: 2017 source edit |
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
::::It reminds me a fair bit of [[User Talk: General MGD 109/Powerful and godlike beings and races]] tbh. (Which was [[Forum:An idea for an unusual page is rejected|rejected]].) It strays too much into other areas of the wiki, category or theory/timeline and is somewhat vague in how you can apply the terms. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC) | ::::It reminds me a fair bit of [[User Talk: General MGD 109/Powerful and godlike beings and races]] tbh. (Which was [[Forum:An idea for an unusual page is rejected|rejected]].) It strays too much into other areas of the wiki, category or theory/timeline and is somewhat vague in how you can apply the terms. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::OTOH, see the longstanding precedent of pages for notable periods of the Doctor's life, like [[Exile on Earth]]. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 19:53, 3 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
: Ettolrahc, that's a great point, which I think the other repliers have missed by fixating on your specific example rather than the question which you were using it to illustrate. "Current practice" and "precedent" are weaselly enough concepts that ''any'' new page could be objected to with the logic that "Current practice and precedent has been to not have a page at that name." The admin closing statement to this thread will hopefully draw some line between these two types of precedent (one might call them "active" vs "passive"). – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 19:53, 3 April 2023 (UTC) |