User:OttselSpy25/Validity topics: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This is, realistically, not ''really'' a sandbox for writing Speedrounds Three. But since I've pretty much figured out what I want to do in Speedround Two, I need somewhere to move all my general notes about topics I've ruled our or am considering. == Topics == === Am generally considering === # Sleeze Brothers - Best to just lay it all out and see what people want. # ''Billy Smart's Children's Circus (TV story)'' - Seems to go with the Proms. Could use a debate but...") Tag: visualeditor-wikitext |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: visualeditor-wikitext |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# ''[[Do You Have a Licence to Save this Planet? (home video)|Do You Have a Licence to Save this Planet?]]'' - No one wants to give BBV more coverage, we're all tired of it. But this is one of the cases where you could make a clear case for the video. | # ''[[Do You Have a Licence to Save this Planet? (home video)|Do You Have a Licence to Save this Planet?]]'' - No one wants to give BBV more coverage, we're all tired of it. But this is one of the cases where you could make a clear case for the video. | ||
# ''[[Doctor Who Pinball: Time Streams]]'' / ''[[Time Streams (video game)|Time Streams]]'' - In my top 4 "Things that should be valid" hot-takes. If I include this in a group post, it should be the only "long" one, since people could disagree with me and there's no reason to overwhelm people. | # ''[[Doctor Who Pinball: Time Streams]]'' / ''[[Time Streams (video game)|Time Streams]]'' - In my top 4 "Things that should be valid" hot-takes. If I include this in a group post, it should be the only "long" one, since people could disagree with me and there's no reason to overwhelm people. | ||
# Jon Culshaw - There are a few select segments from the 2000s of Jon Culshaw as the Doctor which might not be parody by nature. Should we attempt to approach this topic, since Culshaw did so much content as the Doctor? (See: ''The Secret of Germany vs England'' and other obscurities) Or should all live-action Culshaw material be considered "parody" by nature? I know that I personally hate the idea of Culshaw having a tab in the [[Fourth Doctor]] infobox. I think I lean towards invalid for this topic. | |||
## I might actually recommend giving Culshaw his own sub page, allowing invalid coverage of the Culshaw skits, or both. | |||
## This is a weird one because it seems so extremely minor but it could have massive implications if we do it wrong. Might just be too much for a speed round. | |||
=== things I've ruled out === | === things I've ruled out === | ||
Revision as of 22:07, 11 April 2023
This is, realistically, not really a sandbox for writing Speedrounds Three. But since I've pretty much figured out what I want to do in Speedround Two, I need somewhere to move all my general notes about topics I've ruled our or am considering.
Topics
Am generally considering
- Sleeze Brothers - Best to just lay it all out and see what people want.
- Billy Smart's Children's Circus (TV story) - Seems to go with the Proms. Could use a debate but it feels silly to debate things we don't even have pages on.
- Do You Have a Licence to Save this Planet? - No one wants to give BBV more coverage, we're all tired of it. But this is one of the cases where you could make a clear case for the video.
- Doctor Who Pinball: Time Streams / Time Streams - In my top 4 "Things that should be valid" hot-takes. If I include this in a group post, it should be the only "long" one, since people could disagree with me and there's no reason to overwhelm people.
- Jon Culshaw - There are a few select segments from the 2000s of Jon Culshaw as the Doctor which might not be parody by nature. Should we attempt to approach this topic, since Culshaw did so much content as the Doctor? (See: The Secret of Germany vs England and other obscurities) Or should all live-action Culshaw material be considered "parody" by nature? I know that I personally hate the idea of Culshaw having a tab in the Fourth Doctor infobox. I think I lean towards invalid for this topic.
- I might actually recommend giving Culshaw his own sub page, allowing invalid coverage of the Culshaw skits, or both.
- This is a weird one because it seems so extremely minor but it could have massive implications if we do it wrong. Might just be too much for a speed round.
things I've ruled out
- The Last Dalek/K9: Deja Who/Daleks v Cybermen - Can't do this because it involves changing the rules. Should move this to an OP about "what if" stories.
- Voice from the Vortex! - Don't really care about this one, but it would fit well into What If? OP
- Special Executive stories -- but only ones which feature Wardog, Cobweb, and Zeitgeist (mmaaaaaybe Fascination) - This is already being covered. No need to kick a hornest's nest.
