User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20190809230951: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO | Forum Archive | Inclusion debates
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|Inclusion debates/Doctor Who Files}} | |||
Found this discussion on the talk page, [[Talk:Doctor Who Files]], don't think it was ever answered. This kind of question should either be asked of an [[admin]] or posted in this board. | Found this discussion on the talk page, [[Talk:Doctor Who Files]], don't think it was ever answered. This kind of question should either be asked of an [[admin]] or posted in this board. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Narrative source? == | == Narrative source? == | ||
I don't own these books, but it does not seem to me that they're narrative. They seem to be more encyclopedic, and thus not a story. If this is the case, then, according to [[Tardis:Valid sources]], {{tlx|Notdwu}} should be slapped on all the pages, and they shouldn't be covered on this wiki. Can someone who has access to these either confirm or deny that they're narrative?<br>--[[user:SmallerOnTheOutside|SOTO]] [[User talk:SmallerOnTheOutside|☎]] 04:58, April 2, 2013 (UTC) | I don't own these books, but it does not seem to me that they're narrative. They seem to be more encyclopedic, and thus not a story. If this is the case, then, according to [[Tardis:Valid sources]], {{tlx|Notdwu}} should be slapped on all the pages, and they shouldn't be covered on this wiki. Can someone who has access to these either confirm or deny that they're narrative?<br>--[[user:SmallerOnTheOutside|SOTO]] [[User talk:SmallerOnTheOutside|☎]] 04:58, April 2, 2013 (UTC) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190809230951-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:27, 27 April 2023
Found this discussion on the talk page, Talk:Doctor Who Files, don't think it was ever answered. This kind of question should either be asked of an admin or posted in this board.
Here is the discussion (or rather, unanswered question):
Narrative source?[[edit] | [edit source]]
I don't own these books, but it does not seem to me that they're narrative. They seem to be more encyclopedic, and thus not a story. If this is the case, then, according to Tardis:Valid sources, {{Notdwu}} should be slapped on all the pages, and they shouldn't be covered on this wiki. Can someone who has access to these either confirm or deny that they're narrative?
--SOTO ☎ 04:58, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
