User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-27321963-20200505222123: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The only reason that these stories are considered valid is because they were written by Doctor Who writers, CzechOut said it best when he wrote; "If we say this, then every single piece of fan fiction Paul Cornell or Rob Shearman — or whoever — wrote is suddenly debatable". | The only reason that these stories are considered valid is because they were written by Doctor Who writers, CzechOut said it best when he wrote; "If we say this, then every single piece of fan fiction Paul Cornell or Rob Shearman — or whoever — wrote is suddenly debatable". | ||
These writers were simply showing fans how to make their own stories by writing their own fan-fiction in the same format and on the same site, the only difference is who they are. | These writers were simply showing fans how to make their own stories by writing their own fan-fiction in the same format and on the same site, the only difference is who they are. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200505204802-1432718/20200505222123-27321963]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 13:28, 27 April 2023
The only reason that these stories are considered valid is because they were written by Doctor Who writers, CzechOut said it best when he wrote; "If we say this, then every single piece of fan fiction Paul Cornell or Rob Shearman — or whoever — wrote is suddenly debatable".
These writers were simply showing fans how to make their own stories by writing their own fan-fiction in the same format and on the same site, the only difference is who they are.