User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-6032121-20200505234325: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You're saying several inconsistent things. If you believe that this was a "the writers were invited to give the thing a try, and then they 'featured' the results in much the same way they later 'featured' noteworthy fancomics" situation, then the stories ''don't'' have a place on the Wiki. | You're saying several inconsistent things. If you believe that this was a "the writers were invited to give the thing a try, and then they 'featured' the results in much the same way they later 'featured' noteworthy fancomics" situation, then the stories ''don't'' have a place on the Wiki. | ||
But I don't think that's what's going on. I think what happened was that to promote the Comic-Maker, the BBC ''commissioned'' the various writers to create the comics, with the full intent of then publishing the lot of them on the special page I linked to. ''Doctor Who'' comics whose creation was specifically requested by the BBC, and which were then published on the BBC website, are as officially licensed as it gets, I should think. | But I don't think that's what's going on. I think what happened was that to promote the Comic-Maker, the BBC ''commissioned'' the various writers to create the comics, with the full intent of then publishing the lot of them on the special page I linked to. ''Doctor Who'' comics whose creation was specifically requested by the BBC, and which were then published on the BBC website, are as officially licensed as it gets, I should think. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200505204802-1432718/20200505234325-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 27 April 2023
You're saying several inconsistent things. If you believe that this was a "the writers were invited to give the thing a try, and then they 'featured' the results in much the same way they later 'featured' noteworthy fancomics" situation, then the stories don't have a place on the Wiki.
But I don't think that's what's going on. I think what happened was that to promote the Comic-Maker, the BBC commissioned the various writers to create the comics, with the full intent of then publishing the lot of them on the special page I linked to. Doctor Who comics whose creation was specifically requested by the BBC, and which were then published on the BBC website, are as officially licensed as it gets, I should think.
