User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-6032121-20200708220357: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That's fair enough re: strawmen. However, I was simply baffled at the discussion of how and whether the Comic Maker is licensed for use by ordinary people. Clearly arguments about whether the BBC Writers' Comics are licensed are going to hinge on the method of release of these comics through the BBC website — the Comic Maker itself isn't really relevant. | That's fair enough re: strawmen. However, I was simply baffled at the discussion of how and whether the Comic Maker is licensed for use by ordinary people. Clearly arguments about whether the BBC Writers' Comics are licensed are going to hinge on the method of release of these comics through the BBC website — the Comic Maker itself isn't really relevant. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200505204802-1432718/20200708220357-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 27 April 2023
That's fair enough re: strawmen. However, I was simply baffled at the discussion of how and whether the Comic Maker is licensed for use by ordinary people. Clearly arguments about whether the BBC Writers' Comics are licensed are going to hinge on the method of release of these comics through the BBC website — the Comic Maker itself isn't really relevant.
