User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200905235227/@comment-1432718-20200906000449: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please refrain from telling me what I do and don't think. If there's a chance something is a parody, then it's obviously non-valid and should be discussed. Would you rather I pre-emptorially (sorry that's not a word) decide the stories are invalid based on the claim they're parodies? I'm asking for information here. | Please refrain from telling me what I do and don't think. If there's a chance something is a parody, then it's obviously non-valid and should be discussed. Would you rather I pre-emptorially (sorry that's not a word) decide the stories are invalid based on the claim they're parodies? I'm asking for information here. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200905235227-1432718/20200906000449-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 27 April 2023
Please refrain from telling me what I do and don't think. If there's a chance something is a parody, then it's obviously non-valid and should be discussed. Would you rather I pre-emptorially (sorry that's not a word) decide the stories are invalid based on the claim they're parodies? I'm asking for information here.
