User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1783865-20191024110110/@comment-25117610-20191026173712: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Seems pretty open-and-shut to me - in the "about" section, the description text follows the exact same format as the "Doctor Who" channel and - more cmompelling evidence imo - all three of these are listed under "featured channels" of the Doctor Who channel. | Seems pretty open-and-shut to me - in the "about" section, the description text follows the exact same format as the "Doctor Who" channel and - more cmompelling evidence imo - all three of these are listed under "featured channels" of the Doctor Who channel. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
As for coverage on the wiki..... I don't understandy how, and most importantly ''why'' we would try to make a page for each of these channels - they would litteraly be a table of videos, with a link to the official channel n the end of the page.... where people would see all of the videos. Obviously they should at some point be added to the wiki (by admins, of course) but any "coverage" beyond that is ludicrous imo | As for coverage on the wiki..... I don't understandy how, and most importantly ''why'' we would try to make a page for each of these channels - they would litteraly be a table of videos, with a link to the official channel n the end of the page.... where people would see all of the videos. Obviously they should at some point be added to the wiki (by admins, of course) but any "coverage" beyond that is ludicrous imo | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191024110110-1783865/20191026173712-25117610]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:41, 27 April 2023
Seems pretty open-and-shut to me - in the "about" section, the description text follows the exact same format as the "Doctor Who" channel and - more cmompelling evidence imo - all three of these are listed under "featured channels" of the Doctor Who channel.
Plus, Big Finish have shared links to those channels (here, for example) - I hardly believe a company who works under a BBC license would promote an unnoficial YouTube channel.
As for coverage on the wiki..... I don't understandy how, and most importantly why we would try to make a page for each of these channels - they would litteraly be a table of videos, with a link to the official channel n the end of the page.... where people would see all of the videos. Obviously they should at some point be added to the wiki (by admins, of course) but any "coverage" beyond that is ludicrous imo
