User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170424152112: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170424152112'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Danniesen wrote:
Danniesen wrote:
Line 6: Line 5:


I'm sorry, but that sounds like the ''definition'' of a head-canon. We don't cover canon, and if our editors think something is canon isn't relevant to if we cover it.
I'm sorry, but that sounds like the ''definition'' of a head-canon. We don't cover canon, and if our editors think something is canon isn't relevant to if we cover it.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170416191252-2.26.183.189/20170424152112-4028641]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:59, 27 April 2023

Danniesen wrote: Idk, it just doesn't seem to be valid in my eyes.

I'm sorry, but that sounds like the definition of a head-canon. We don't cover canon, and if our editors think something is canon isn't relevant to if we cover it.