231,276
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28349479-20161216221639/@comment-28349479-20161217041953 (edit)
Revision as of 14:21, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In regards to the Faction Paradox Wiki: I don't know if I've met a single FP fan who was involved with the franchise before Obverse got the rights. It used to be unknown on Reddit and Tumblr; now there's consistent, almost daily discussion between many users. So if the fanbase has grown so much, why have there been [http://factionparadox.wikia.com/wiki/Special:RecentChanges?days=365&useskin=oasis fewer than twenty-five edits on the Faction Paradox Wiki in the last year?!?] Definitely not what you'd expect from a series whose first book is a literal encyclopedia! | In regards to the Faction Paradox Wiki: I don't know if I've met a single FP fan who was involved with the franchise before Obverse got the rights. It used to be unknown on Reddit and Tumblr; now there's consistent, almost daily discussion between many users. So if the fanbase has grown so much, why have there been [http://factionparadox.wikia.com/wiki/Special:RecentChanges?days=365&useskin=oasis fewer than twenty-five edits on the Faction Paradox Wiki in the last year?!?] Definitely not what you'd expect from a series whose first book is a literal encyclopedia! | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
However, first we need to get to the bottom of whether Faction Paradox belongs. I think I've demonstrated pretty thoroughly in the OP how it doesn't violate the four little rules, but I'd be very curious to hear any new or unaddressed arguments against FP's membership in the DWU. | However, first we need to get to the bottom of whether Faction Paradox belongs. I think I've demonstrated pretty thoroughly in the OP how it doesn't violate the four little rules, but I'd be very curious to hear any new or unaddressed arguments against FP's membership in the DWU. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20161216221639-28349479/20161217041953-28349479]]</noinclude> | ||