User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20190216032054/@comment-6032121-20190529181134: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20190216032054/@comment-6032121-20190529181134'''
Interesting quote to be sure; but while I can see the similarity between what he's here saying about Death's Head and the pronouncements that ruled out Vienna Salvatori (which I think is what you're getting at with this?), he's not saying anything about ''universes'' as had been the case with Vienna; only IRL franchises. Seems to me this could just as easily be Paul Magrs discussing Iris. Different franchises doesn't necessarily mean different continuities. (Note that I picked my example carefully, what with Iris, just like Death's Head, having debuted in a non-DWU, non-DW-connected story before she so lastingly crashed into the Whoniverse.)  
Interesting quote to be sure; but while I can see the similarity between what he's here saying about Death's Head and the pronouncements that ruled out Vienna Salvatori (which I think is what you're getting at with this?), he's not saying anything about ''universes'' as had been the case with Vienna; only IRL franchises. Seems to me this could just as easily be Paul Magrs discussing Iris. Different franchises doesn't necessarily mean different continuities. (Note that I picked my example carefully, what with Iris, just like Death's Head, having debuted in a non-DWU, non-DW-connected story before she so lastingly crashed into the Whoniverse.)  


At best it is a further argument not to include non-specifically-DWU-connected Death's Head material on the Wiki. But a mostly-IRL comment, to my mind, does not outweigh the explicit evidence of intended narrative continuity that is discussing the Doctor by name.
At best it is a further argument not to include non-specifically-DWU-connected Death's Head material on the Wiki. But a mostly-IRL comment, to my mind, does not outweigh the explicit evidence of intended narrative continuity that is discussing the Doctor by name.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190216032054-28743561/20190529181134-6032121]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:23, 27 April 2023

Interesting quote to be sure; but while I can see the similarity between what he's here saying about Death's Head and the pronouncements that ruled out Vienna Salvatori (which I think is what you're getting at with this?), he's not saying anything about universes as had been the case with Vienna; only IRL franchises. Seems to me this could just as easily be Paul Magrs discussing Iris. Different franchises doesn't necessarily mean different continuities. (Note that I picked my example carefully, what with Iris, just like Death's Head, having debuted in a non-DWU, non-DW-connected story before she so lastingly crashed into the Whoniverse.)

At best it is a further argument not to include non-specifically-DWU-connected Death's Head material on the Wiki. But a mostly-IRL comment, to my mind, does not outweigh the explicit evidence of intended narrative continuity that is discussing the Doctor by name.