User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20190914124052/@comment-6032121-20190922151700: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20190914124052/@comment-6032121-20190922151700'''
Just dropping in to show support. For all the reasons cited above, it seems transparently obvious that this is a ''Doctor Who'' spin-off through and through, not a case of an author happening to debut in a DWU story a concept they wanted to explore for its own sake anyway.
Just dropping in to show support. For all the reasons cited above, it seems transparently obvious that this is a ''Doctor Who'' spin-off through and through, not a case of an author happening to debut in a DWU story a concept they wanted to explore for its own sake anyway.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190914124052-28743561/20190922151700-6032121]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:23, 27 April 2023

Just dropping in to show support. For all the reasons cited above, it seems transparently obvious that this is a Doctor Who spin-off through and through, not a case of an author happening to debut in a DWU story a concept they wanted to explore for its own sake anyway.