User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-30922197-20191009200901: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I agree with the proposal to cover the new version in a new page, as I feel that having a different production crew, music, actors, and well, pretty much everything apart from the plot, seems notable enough to warrant its own page. | I agree with the proposal to cover the new version in a new page, as I feel that having a different production crew, music, actors, and well, pretty much everything apart from the plot, seems notable enough to warrant its own page. | ||
It is after all all new footage, and new costumes as well. I feel representing that on the 1965 page would be a disservice to both version, and wouldn't really be accurate, or, as [[User:Borisashton]] pointed out, even misleading to readers. | It is after all all new footage, and new costumes as well. I feel representing that on the 1965 page would be a disservice to both version, and wouldn't really be accurate, or, as [[User:Borisashton]] pointed out, even misleading to readers. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191009174707-28743561/20191009200901-30922197]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:25, 27 April 2023
I agree with the proposal to cover the new version in a new page, as I feel that having a different production crew, music, actors, and well, pretty much everything apart from the plot, seems notable enough to warrant its own page.
It is after all all new footage, and new costumes as well. I feel representing that on the 1965 page would be a disservice to both version, and wouldn't really be accurate, or, as User:Borisashton pointed out, even misleading to readers.
