User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-38288735-20191115180808: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-38288735-20191115180808'''
We've laid out our arguments in regard to that issue.  Unless I missed something, the only users who have posted in this thread who have not stated support for creating a new page are:
We've laid out our arguments in regard to that issue.  Unless I missed something, the only users who have posted in this thread who have not stated support for creating a new page are:


Line 15: Line 14:


In summary, I believe that there is little more to add to this discussion.  I could be wrong, though, which is why I asked if anyone had anything new to add.
In summary, I believe that there is little more to add to this discussion.  I could be wrong, though, which is why I asked if anyone had anything new to add.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191009174707-28743561/20191115180808-38288735]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:25, 27 April 2023

We've laid out our arguments in regard to that issue. Unless I missed something, the only users who have posted in this thread who have not stated support for creating a new page are:

Danniesen, who seems to be the only one explicitly against a separate page
SteamMoose, who made a point that supported a separate page but never explicitly stated their overall opinion
Shambala108, who declined to weigh in, but provided a link that suggested they could be considered the same as special editions, which do not get their own page
OttselSpy25, who kind of expressed support, but seemed hesitant about setting precedent
You, Bwburke94, who just joined, but have not expressed an opinion one way or another

In my mind, the arguments have been made pretty thoroughly. Yes, Danniesen has given no indication of changing their mind, but it's fine for people to disagree. Shambala108 has implied a comparison to special edition DVDs, but we have pointed out that this differs from Special Editions in having entirely different cast, crew, music, etc. Also, as Scrooge pointed out, there is precedent for having separate pages for the same story with novelizations; it's just a question of where we draw the line between deserving separate pages and not.

In summary, I believe that there is little more to add to this discussion. I could be wrong, though, which is why I asked if anyone had anything new to add.