User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-30566352-20170223033959/@comment-4028641-20170223042801: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-30566352-20170223033959/@comment-4028641-20170223042801'''
I can't help but wonder if I'm being mocked here...
I can't help but wonder if I'm being mocked here...


Anyways, I've actually heard for several years that they didn't have the rights to use the Daleks. Isn't the story that they thought the Daleks were public domain, and the TN estate almost didn't lend the BBC the rights because of this?
Anyways, I've actually heard for several years that they didn't have the rights to use the Daleks. Isn't the story that they thought the Daleks were public domain, and the TN estate almost didn't lend the BBC the rights because of this?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170223033959-30566352/20170223042801-4028641]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:26, 27 April 2023

I can't help but wonder if I'm being mocked here...

Anyways, I've actually heard for several years that they didn't have the rights to use the Daleks. Isn't the story that they thought the Daleks were public domain, and the TN estate almost didn't lend the BBC the rights because of this?