User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-1827503-20191004051712: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
When I said "there is no rule blocking self-published stories from being valid", it was a fact. | When I said "there is no rule blocking self-published stories from being valid", it was a fact. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Is that correct? | Is that correct? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190928203157-31010985/20191004051712-1827503]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:29, 27 April 2023
When I said "there is no rule blocking self-published stories from being valid", it was a fact.
However, when I said Dawns was "easily valid, unless the situation has changed" in the post before that, it was my opinion.
Is that correct?
