User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-31010985-20191115231832: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-31010985-20191115231832'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Doug86 wrote:
Doug86 wrote:
Line 5: Line 4:
</div>
</div>
Just to clarify, is that your opinion as a participant of the debate or your verdict on the validity of the stories as a closing admin?
Just to clarify, is that your opinion as a participant of the debate or your verdict on the validity of the stories as a closing admin?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191101112654-31010985/20191115231832-31010985]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:32, 27 April 2023

Doug86 wrote: I also still think these stories are valid.

Just to clarify, is that your opinion as a participant of the debate or your verdict on the validity of the stories as a closing admin?