User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-38288735-20191116053448: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-38288735-20191116053448'''
Yes, that seems like an aggressive response to what looks like a misunderstanding.  Borisashton asked Doug86 if his support was the closing opinion of an admin, and they said yes, but did not close the thread.  It seems like a perfectly natural thing to ask about.  Perhaps Doug misread the question, had second thoughts, or simply forgot to close it, but we wouldn't know which without asking.
Yes, that seems like an aggressive response to what looks like a misunderstanding.  Borisashton asked Doug86 if his support was the closing opinion of an admin, and they said yes, but did not close the thread.  It seems like a perfectly natural thing to ask about.  Perhaps Doug misread the question, had second thoughts, or simply forgot to close it, but we wouldn't know which without asking.


EDIT: Just realized that you probably meant the admin's closing arguments had to be well-worded and that could be the source of the delay.  Still a bit strongly-worded, but thank you for the information.
EDIT: Just realized that you probably meant the admin's closing arguments had to be well-worded and that could be the source of the delay.  Still a bit strongly-worded, but thank you for the information.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191101112654-31010985/20191116053448-38288735]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:33, 27 April 2023

Yes, that seems like an aggressive response to what looks like a misunderstanding. Borisashton asked Doug86 if his support was the closing opinion of an admin, and they said yes, but did not close the thread. It seems like a perfectly natural thing to ask about. Perhaps Doug misread the question, had second thoughts, or simply forgot to close it, but we wouldn't know which without asking.

EDIT: Just realized that you probably meant the admin's closing arguments had to be well-worded and that could be the source of the delay. Still a bit strongly-worded, but thank you for the information.