User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1827503-20180212213950: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The reason I stated we need not discuss the nature of a narrative ''at this time'' is rather simple: something else needs to be discussed first. | The reason I stated we need not discuss the nature of a narrative ''at this time'' is rather simple: something else needs to be discussed first. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
In fact, ''Flip-Flop'' is similar to these video games for another reason: it is fixed media which can be experienced in multiple orders. | In fact, ''Flip-Flop'' is similar to these video games for another reason: it is fixed media which can be experienced in multiple orders. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20180212213950-1827503]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:39, 27 April 2023
The reason I stated we need not discuss the nature of a narrative at this time is rather simple: something else needs to be discussed first.
At no point does T:VS mention variable narratives. The stage-plays ruling discusses ephemeral media, which is quite different. Given the above objection to the "all variable narratives are invalid" stance, and the existing case of the variable narrative Flip-Flop being valid, it would be premature to shut down that part of the discussion early.
In fact, Flip-Flop is similar to these video games for another reason: it is fixed media which can be experienced in multiple orders.
