User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1350697-20170228123028: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1350697-20170228123028'''
Because this is almost certainly going to keep happening, and we're never gonna settle on any of this in any direction, I really feel like the thing to do here would be to have a policy that LEGO narratives, because of their ambiguous nature as possibly being play-sessions come to life, are invalid by default.
Because this is almost certainly going to keep happening, and we're never gonna settle on any of this in any direction, I really feel like the thing to do here would be to have a policy that LEGO narratives, because of their ambiguous nature as possibly being play-sessions come to life, are invalid by default.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170228123028-1350697]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:42, 27 April 2023

Because this is almost certainly going to keep happening, and we're never gonna settle on any of this in any direction, I really feel like the thing to do here would be to have a policy that LEGO narratives, because of their ambiguous nature as possibly being play-sessions come to life, are invalid by default.