User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-24894325-20170224210427: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
OttselSpy25 wrote: | OttselSpy25 wrote: | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
PS I understand your frustration that the movie did not cover it because it was not crucial to the movie's plot. But it not being crucial to the plot is also telling. | PS I understand your frustration that the movie did not cover it because it was not crucial to the movie's plot. But it not being crucial to the plot is also telling. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170224210427-24894325]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:45, 27 April 2023
OttselSpy25 wrote: Even if one of those dimensions isn't a Who Dimension, we still have an explanation.
This point is absolutely crucial because an explanation does not suffice to pass Rule 4. Let me quote:
If a story was intended to be set outside the DWU, then it's probably not allowed.
It was pointed out in other discussions that DWU is really a multi-verse. However, it may or may not be the same as the multiverse of the movie. And we are not allowed to speculate that it is. Only a direct connection can establish this.
Let me emphasise once again that neither LEGO canon nor LEGO Dimensions is relevant here as they are not (yet) part of DWU.
PS I understand your frustration that the movie did not cover it because it was not crucial to the movie's plot. But it not being crucial to the plot is also telling.
