User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-90.216.60.107-20170226134719: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-90.216.60.107-20170226134719'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Amorkuz wrote:
Amorkuz wrote:
Line 5: Line 4:
</div>
</div>
The main consensus on the thread discussing that movie was that it wasn't fully licensed. Wasn't it?
The main consensus on the thread discussing that movie was that it wasn't fully licensed. Wasn't it?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170226134719-90.216.60.107]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:51, 27 April 2023

Amorkuz wrote: Their appearance is also licensed.

The main consensus on the thread discussing that movie was that it wasn't fully licensed. Wasn't it?