User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170306172600/@comment-1272640-20180319080336: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I hate to necropost, but I agree that there's really no reason to consider ''Rescue'', ''Storm in a Tikka'', or ''Fixing a Hole'' invalid based on the fact that they refer to invalid stories. That's dangerously close to moving from an invalid/valid distinction to a non-canon/canon distinction. And I don't like such a concept at all. | I hate to necropost, but I agree that there's really no reason to consider ''Rescue'', ''Storm in a Tikka'', or ''Fixing a Hole'' invalid based on the fact that they refer to invalid stories. That's dangerously close to moving from an invalid/valid distinction to a non-canon/canon distinction. And I don't like such a concept at all. | ||
I've read ''Storm in a Tikka''. It's really its own thing, as supported by OttelSpy25's quotes provided. | I've read ''Storm in a Tikka''. It's really its own thing, as supported by OttelSpy25's quotes provided. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170306172600-4028641/20180319080336-1272640]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:51, 27 April 2023
I hate to necropost, but I agree that there's really no reason to consider Rescue, Storm in a Tikka, or Fixing a Hole invalid based on the fact that they refer to invalid stories. That's dangerously close to moving from an invalid/valid distinction to a non-canon/canon distinction. And I don't like such a concept at all.
I've read Storm in a Tikka. It's really its own thing, as supported by OttelSpy25's quotes provided.
