User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20171124185300/@comment-4028641-20171129152016: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does anyone have any argument for why the 2017 release of ''Shada'' shouldn't be valid? I really can't imagine any. | Does anyone have any argument for why the 2017 release of ''Shada'' shouldn't be valid? I really can't imagine any. | ||
More specifically I suppose this thread will most likely be about the ins-and-outs of merging the three "versions" of the TV ''Shada'' into one page. | More specifically I suppose this thread will most likely be about the ins-and-outs of merging the three "versions" of the TV ''Shada'' into one page. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20171124185300-4028641/20171129152016-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:13, 27 April 2023
Does anyone have any argument for why the 2017 release of Shada shouldn't be valid? I really can't imagine any.
More specifically I suppose this thread will most likely be about the ins-and-outs of merging the three "versions" of the TV Shada into one page.
